>>>back
to main page
>>>back
issues-2004
news mail -2003 <English>
<contents>
[news mail 06 Dec 03 ] The Peace Constitution
[news mail 02 Oct 03] Lone Diplomat Standing for
Truth
[news mail 26 Sep 03 ]The Toxic Legacy of the Iraq
War
[news mail 12 Aug 03] 2003 Hiroshima Peace Declaration
[news mail 04 Aug 03] Mystery illness kills soldier
[news mail 03 Jul 03] Mr. Morizumi's Iraq report
[news mail 02 Jul 03] Deadly waste returned to
US forces
[news mail 01 Jul 03 ] US troops 'shoot civilians'
[news mail 25 Jun 03] Troops show uranium sickness
signs
[news mail 30 May 03] U.S. Colonel Admits 500 Tons
of D.U. Were Used in Iraq
[news mail 28 May 03] Rebecca Solnit on hope in
dark time
[news mail 06 May 03] Veterans claim Gulf syndrome
victory
[news mail 20 Apr 03] Al-Tuwaitha turned into a
Horrific Uranium-contamination Zone
[news mail 18 Apr 03] Free to commit crimes and
do bad things
[news mail 15 Apr 03] Image-making, lies and the
"liberation" of Iraq
[news mail 05 Apr 03] The stories of the soldiers
[news mail 04 Apr 03] UK Defence Secretary said
'Don't believe the Fisk's reports'
[news mail 03 Apr 03] Human Shields - Mission accomplished
[news mail 02 Apr 03] Children killed in US cluster
bomb attack
[news mail 27 Mar03] Ritter : US WILL LOSE
[news mail 21 Mar 03] UK children protest the war!
[news mail 06 Dec 03 ]
The Peace Constitution
Dear friends,
Midori at the 'Children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing.
Two Japanese diplomats were killed in Iraq last weekend. You may have heard or
read this news.
Though there is no information yet as to who killed them, I think it is highly
likely that Iraqi resistance did it. (Note that it's my guess.)
If so, who is to blame? People who shot the diplomats? Or is it that the victims
just got what they deserved?
Junichiro Koizumi, the Japanese prime minister, and his government say they are
willing to play a part in this "war on terror" and to send "our troops," Japanese
Self-Defense Force(SDF), to Iraq in order to support the "reconstruction."
I am, of course, a Japanese national. Sending troops to Iraq is, I believe, supporting
this immoral invasion and occupation by the American and British governments.
It's not only me: according to a recent poll, the majority of Japanese people
don't agree with the prime minister. There are many reasons for this, the biggest
being that sending SDF is utterly against Japan's constitution.
Japan's constitution is sometimes called "peace constitution." You might want
to see why it's called so. Take a look at the article 9:
CHAPTER II. RENUNCIATION OF WAR / Article 9.
Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese
people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat
or use of force as means of settling international disputes. In order to accomplish
the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other
war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state
will not be recognized.
* To read the whole Japan's constitution in English, visit:
http://www.okakogi.go.jp/People/miwa/document/law/ConstitutionOfJapan.html
This constitution came into power in November 1946, less than fifteen months after
the World War II ended, or I'd better say Japan was defeated.
As a Japanese national, I am very proud of this "peace constitution," especially
of this article 9.
Sadly enough, some dispute has arisen about our constitution. Politicians are
talking about how this constitution should be revised, not if it should be revised.
Over these decades, the "interpretation" of the constitution has been distorted,
and Japan keeps sending PKF troops to some areas like Cambodia.
What a shame. We have the most beautiful law in the world, don't we?
Japanese politicians say this constitution is "old, out-dated and almost useless."
I don't agree.
I have a dream: peace constitution for more countries. The more countries "renounce
war," the more peaceful the world will be. You may say I'm a dreamer, but this
is what I want to see. And of cource, Japan should never throw it away. We have
to keep it for ever to make the world a better place.
With love,
Midori
[news mail 02 Oct 03]
Lone Japanese Diplomat Standing for Truth
Here is a dispatch from Japanese opinion magazine became public
recently, translated by Chihaya who is my dear friend, one of the members of the
exhibition Australia tour and a member of the TUP / Translators United for Peace.
It is open for free distribution.
---------------------------------------------
Lone Diplomat Standing for Truth
http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2003/10/70384.php
Japanese Ambassador to Lebanon was intimidated and fired because he kept sending
messages to higher officials demanding to stop supporting the Invasion to Iraq
that the United States and the United Kingdom initiated.
Yet Mr. Amaki, the former Ambassador has not been beaten. He rejected the alternative
job offer in order to cut his relationship with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
completely, and is preparing to keep prosecuting the responsible because he had
an information that the plan of Iraq Invasion was already there more than a year
ago.
Here is what he had to say, when the invasion started. Mr. Amaki has approved
me to forward my translation of his letter he wrote on 23rd of March, so please
feel free to share it with your friends and families.
Chihaya
May Earth be Filled with Peace and Happiness!
------------------------------------
"And the war began"
by Naoto Amaki
March 23, 2003
http://www.meij.or.jp/countries/lebanon/amaki92.htm
(in Japanese)
Naoto Amaki
Japanese Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to Lebanon
March 23, 2003
The twentieth of March, 2003 will be an unforgettable day as part of the history
of diplomacy in the Middle East and in my life as a diplomat over 34 years.
The bombing of Baghdad during the second day of the invasion by the United States
was shocking. They called it "Shock and Awe." They say it was the operation to
weaken Iraqis' fighting spirit by the sound of explosions and emphasizing their
destroying power. It's such a horrible deed to deny humanity. And we are about
to see an unimaginable disaster being developed under the name of capturing Baghdad.
Facing the atrocity through TV screen without averting my eyes, I realized again
that war is a concept that verifies failed diplomacy. Diplomacy must be optimized
to avoid this situation no matter what.
During the two years of my assignment in this small country in the Middle East,
I found that Lebanese people were fond of Japanese and our culture. They saw us
as diligent and polite people who value tradition, and are fully aware how precious
peace is from our devastating experience as a consequence of the nuclear bomb
dropped on Hiroshima. And they thought that Japanese would understand the Arabs,
and they wanted us to take initiative in pursuit of the peace in the Middle East.
I was able to fulfill my task as the Ambassador with their positive and favorable
wishes towards us.
But when the words of Prime Minister Koizumi supporting the United States' War
on Iraq were introduced repeatedly through media, everybody I saw here that regardless
of their position both government officials or civilians, said to me, "I was surprised
and disappointed with Japanese attitude. I believed that you were different from
Americans and would understand us Arabs. This must be some kind of mistake. I
still want to believe that there is no way Japan choosing to support this." I
received phone calls from Lebanese whom I never met. This didn't happen even once
in the past two years.
However, they still are kind to me. They don't protest with anger in their faces,
but tell me "It's a shame, it is a great shame" with such sad expression. My heart
is torn, aches and grieves.
Just like picking up pieces of rubbles destroyed by missiles, I would like to
pick up the pieces of the Middle East diplomacy one by one from the beginning
within Lebanon. That is my fervent wish and why l keep sending you a letter from
Lebanon.
>>page top
[news mail 26 Sep 03]
The Toxic Legacy of the Iraq War
Generational Casualties
By STAN GOFF
The Toxic Legacy of the Iraq War
Generational Casualties
By STAN GOFF
September 24, 2003
Counter punch
My grandson was born last December at Womack Army Medical Center, one of
the finest medical facilties in the country now. The labor and delivery room
was nicer than many hotel rooms. The care and attention was nonpareil. Military
medical care -- now under idiotic pressure to privatize -- is proof that profit
is often antithetical to the provision of quality services.
My grandson was born there because his father -- my son -- was entitled to this
quality care as a member of the Army. My son is now languishing in a former
palace along the Euphrates River, surrounded by millions of people who don't
want him there, waiting for mail that takes four to five weeks to arrive, keeping
an ear attuned for incoming mortars, and gazing at pictures of his son -- our
grandson -- who will not know him when he returns.
My grandson is perfect, and I don't just say that because I have become a grandparent
cliche -- which I have, with my office and home both converted into shrines
full of baby photos. He is perfect in that he has all his assigned parts, they
function in coordination with one another, and his growth and development are
proceeding, as the medical folk say, normally. He was born with great lungs
and the grip of a longshoreman, he never seems to get sick, and he seems very
interested in all people, in all music, in squirrels, and in passing automobiles.
He seems to go into a trance when a breeze blows on his face, and he chatters
and blows raspberries when he is excited.
I am crazy in love with this child, spoil him shamelessly, have already dedicated
a book to him, and I look forward to more grandchildren, having three more kids
who are well into their reproductive years.
At a recent Congressional briefing organized by Congresswoman Maxine Waters,
ten military family members, myself included, testified about our opposition
to Bushfeld's War. Afterwards, during dinner together, one of the young military
spouses told me that she and her husband, now stationed in Iraq, had made a
decision not to have children. Since then, those if us involved with the Bring
Them Home Now campaign are hearing this more and more from military couples.
They are worried about depleted uranium.
My grandson is learning to walk, and he is immensely curious, which makes for
a lot of vigilance and work. But he didn't require massive surgery to survive
to his ninth month, nor does he require a battery of experts and specialists
like he would if he were born without a thyroid gland, or if he required a drain
inserted into his cranial vault, or if his digestive tract were disconnected.
This happens a lot more than it should to Iraqi children, and it may happen
to American children born to parents now serving in Iraq. That's why many couples
in the military are now deciding that they will not have children. Here is an
excert from a letter on the Bring Them Home Now web site: "My husband and I
have decided not to have children. We are afraid that something that we've been
exposed to in Iraq may cause birth defects. This whole war has turned my life
upside down and is even affecting my life years into the future."
For those who are not faint-hearted, you can visit this site <*> where
there are some very disturbing images of "extreme birth defects" in Iraq, that
are occurring at alarming rates, lest anyone think this is an irrational fear
being expressed by these military couples.
<*> http://www.web-light.nl/VISIE/extremedeformities.html
I am a big fan of these kinds of images, because the sense of decorum of our so-called
press that excludes "offensive" images is a form of complicity. War is offensive.
If we are to understand war, we need to see the bodies. People who support it
should have to see it. Likewise, if you want to understand the reality of what
is going on in the bodies of the troops, you need to see these terribly deformed
children. We need to broadcast images of dead people, maimed people, deformed
children, including our own dead and maimed and deformed, and we need to do it
often. Anything else is denial.
[To read more]
http://www.counterpunch.org/
[Stan Goff] is the author of "Hideous Dream: A Soldier's Memoir of the US Invasion
of Haiti" (Soft Skull Press, 2000) and of the upcoming book "Full Spectrum Disorder"
(Soft Skull Press, 2003). He is a member of the BRING THEM HOME NOW! coordinating
committee, a retired Special Forces master sergeant, and the father of an active
duty soldier. Email for BRING THEM HOME NOW! is bthn@mfso.org.
Goff can be reached at: sherrynstan@igc.org
>>page top
[news mail 12 Aug 03]
Hiroshima / Nagasaki Peace Declarations
Dear friends,
Midori at the Children of the Gulf War photo exhibition UK tour writing from Japan
again. There are transcriptions of the speech at the peace ceremonies of Hiroshima
on 6th and Nagasaki on 9th of August given by the mayors of both cities. If you
already read them, please read again and spread widely! If you don't yet read
them, please read carefully and also spread widely!
And an e-mail from my Japanese friend who living in Australia is following . She
reported her action on that Hiroshima day in Melbourne.
I introduce a picture book, it titled 'Hiroshima no Pika'. Pika is a ward of sound
of a strong lightning in Japanese language, it means nuclear bomb, title of the
book means 'Atomic-bomb on Hiroshima'. That is a great picture book for knowing
of consequences of atomic bomb for every ages including children of course. This
is a story of a little girl who lived in Hiroshima with her parents on that day,
an atomic bomb it called 'Little Boy' fell down from the blue sky by US force
at WW2.
Author is Toshi Maruki who was a Japanese fine-artist died several years ago.
Her husband, Iri Maruki was also a great fine-artist. They painted some big pictures
about the nuclear bomb and the people in Hiroshima.
'Hiroshima no Pika' have been translating to several language. You can read some
information about T Maruki and see some pictures of the 'Hiroshima no Pika' at
the below.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0688012973/qid=1055418711/sr=8
-1/ref=sr_8_1/103-7637854-4571831?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
With love and peace from Japan,
-------------------------------------------------
2003 HIROSHIMA PEACE DECLARATION
August 6, 2003
By Tadatoshi Akiba
--------------------------------------------------
This year again, summer's heat reminds us of the blazing hell fire that swept
over this very spot fifty-eight years ago. The world without nuclear weapons and
beyond war that our hibakusha have sought for so long appears to be slipping deeper
into a thick cover of dark clouds that they fear at any minute could become mushroom
clouds spilling black rain.
The nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the central international agreement guiding
the elimination of nuclear weapons, is on the verge of collapse. The chief cause
is U.S. nuclear policy that, by openly declaring the possibility of a pre-emptive
nuclear first strike and calling for resumed research into mini-nukes and other
so-called "useable nuclear weapons," appears to worship nuclear weapons as God.
However, nuclear weapons are not the only problem. Acting as if the United Nations
Charter and the Japanese Constitution don't even exist, the world has suddenly
veered sharply away from post-war toward pre-war mentality. As the U.S.-U.K.-
led war on Iraq made clear, the assertion that war is peace is being trumpeted
as truth. Conducted with disregard for the multitudes around the world demanding
a peaceful solution through continued UN inspections, this war slaughtered innocent
women, children, and the elderly. It destroyed the environment, most notably through
radioactive contamination that will be with us for billions of years. And the
weapons of mass destruction that served as the excuse for the war have yet to
be found.
However, as President Lincoln once said, "You can't fool all the people all the
time." Now is the time for us to focus once again on the truth that "Darkness
can never be dispelled by darkness, only by light." The rule of power is darkness.
The rule of law is light. In the darkness of retaliation, the proper path for
human civilization is illumined by the spirit of reconciliation born of the hibakusha's
determination that "no one else should ever suffer as we did."
Lifting up that light, the aging hibakusha are calling for U.S. President George
Bush to visit Hiroshima. We all support that call and hereby demand that President
Bush, Chairman Kim Jong Il of North Korea, and the leaders of all nuclear-weapon
states come to Hiroshima and confront the reality of nuclear war. We must somehow
convey to them that nuclear weapons are utterly evil, inhumane and illegal under
international law. In the meanwhile, we expect that the facts about Hiroshima
and Nagasaki will be shared throughout the world, and that the Hiroshima-Nagasaki
Peace Study Course will be established in ever more colleges and universities.
To strengthen the NPT regime, the city of Hiroshima is calling on all members
of the World Conference of Mayors for Peace to take emergency action to promote
the abolition of nuclear weapons. Our goal is to gather a strong delegation of
mayors representing cities throughout the world to participate in the NPT Review
Conference that will take place in New York in 2005, the 60th year after the atomic
bombing. In New York, we will lobby national delegates for the start of negotiations
at the United Nations on a universal Nuclear Weapons Convention providing for
the complete elimination of nuclear weapons.
At the same time, Hiroshima calls on politicians, religious professionals, academics,
writers, journalists, teachers, artists, athletes and other leaders with influence.
We must establish a climate that immediately confronts even casual comments that
appear to approve of nuclear weapons or war. To prevent war and to abolish the
absolute evil of nuclear weapons, we must pray, speak, and act to that effect
in our daily lives.
The Japanese government, which publicly asserts its status as "the only A-bombed
nation," must fulfill the responsibilities that accompany that status, both at
home and abroad. Specifically, it must adopt as national precepts the three new
non-nuclear principles - allow no production, allow no possession, and allow no
use of nuclear weapons anywhere in the world - and work conscientiously toward
an Asian nuclear-free zone. It must also provide full support to all hibakusha
everywhere, including those exposed in "black rain areas" and those who live overseas.
On this 58th August 6, we offer our heartfelt condolences to the souls of all
atomic bomb victims, and we renew our pledge to do everything in our power to
abolish nuclear weapons and eliminate war altogether by the time we turn this
world over to our children.
Tadatoshi Akiba
Mayor, The City of Hiroshima
(Printable versions are)
http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/03e/8_6/declaration/hdeclaration.html
(or)
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=17&ItemID=4013
-------------------------------------------------
2003 NAGASAKI PEACE DECLARATION
August 9, 2003
By Iccho Itoh
-------------------------------------------------
Today, the modern buildings and houses of Nagasaki's verdant cityscape make it
difficult to imagine what happened here at the end of the Second World War on
August 9 at 11:02 AM, fifty-eight years ago. An American aircraft dropped a single
atomic bomb that was detonated at an altitude of about 500 meters over the district
known as Matsuyama-machi. In an instant, the resulting heat rays, blast wind,
and radiation descended upon Nagasaki and transformed the city into a hell on
Earth. Some 74,000 people were killed, and 75,000 injured. Many of those who were
spared from death were afflicted with incurable physical and mental wounds, and
many continue today to suffer from the after-effects of the atomic bombing, and
from health problems induced by the stress of their experience. We have ceaselessly
called for the eradication of nuclear weapons and the establishment of world peace,
so that such a tragedy is never repeated.
Nevertheless, in March of this year, the US and the UK launched a preemptive attack
on Iraq, whom they accused of possessing weapons of mass destruction. In the ensuing
war, waged in the absence of a United Nations resolution, the lives of many civilians
were sacrificed in addition to those of soldiers. We deeply regret that this conflict
could not be averted, despite our appeals for a peaceful resolution based on international
cooperation, and a rising worldwide anti-war movement.
In January of last year, the United States government conducted a nuclear posture
review, recommending the development of mini-nuclear weapons and the resumption
of nuclear explosions for test purposes, and openly proposing the use of nuclear
weapons under certain circumstances. At the same time, following nuclear tests
by India and Pakistan, the disclosure by North Korea that it too possesses nuclear
weapons has served to heighten the tension of international society. International
agreements supporting nuclear disarmament, nuclear non-proliferation, and the
prohibition of all nuclear weapons testing now appear to be on the verge of collapse.
Mother Theresa, when she visited Nagasaki, commented as she viewed a picture of
a boy whose body had been burnt black in the atomic bombing, "The leaders of all
the nuclear states should come to Nagasaki to see this photograph." We do indeed
invite the leaders of the US and the other nuclear weapons states to visit the
Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Museum, so that they may witness with their own eyes the
tragic outcome of these instruments of destruction.
We also urge the government of Japan, the only country to have sustained a nuclear
attack, to stand at the forefront of efforts to eliminate nuclear weapons. In
response to concerns voiced both domestically and internationally over the possibility
of Japan's remilitarization and nuclear armament, the government must uphold the
principle of an exclusively defensive posture, and the Three Non-Nuclear Principles
(stating that Japan will not possess, manufacture or allow nuclear weapons into
the country) must be passed into law, thus demonstrating the sincerity of Japan's
intentions. The Korean Peninsula Non-Nuclear Joint Statement must be realized
in cooperation with other nations, and, based on the spirit of the Pyongyang Declaration,
work must begin on the establishment of a Northeast Asia nuclear-weapon-free zone.
It is our hope that younger generations may continue to work for the advancement
of science and technology in pursuit of human happiness. May they also consider
what has been wrought upon humanity when these have been misused, and learn from
the events of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. May they turn their eyes to the wider world
around them, consider what must be done to bring about peace, and join hands in
concerted action.
Here in Nagasaki, the hibakusha atomic bomb survivors, growing increasingly older,
are continuing to earnestly retell their experiences of the atomic bombing, and
large numbers of young people are actively engaged in peace promotion and volunteer
activities. Nagasaki City will persevere in providing opportunities for learning
and reflection, that the experiences of the atomic bombing may not become lost
and forgotten. In November of this year, we will host for the second time the
Nagasaki Global Citizens' Assembly for the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons, an
international gathering of peace-supporting NGOs and individuals, held in advance
of the 2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation
of Nuclear Weapons, calling to the peoples of the world for the abolition of nuclear
weapons.
Today, on the 58th anniversary of the atomic bombing, as we pray for the repose
of those who died and recall to mind their suffering, we the citizens of Nagasaki
pledge our commitment to the realization of true peace in the world, free from
nuclear weapons.
Iccho Itoh,
Mayor of Nagasaki
(Printable versions are)
http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/03e/8_9/declaration/ndeclaration.html
(or)
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=17&ItemID=4022
-------------------------------------------------
2002 HIROSHIMA PEACE DECLARATION
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/02e/8_6/declaration/hdeclaration.html
-------------------------------------------------
2002 NAGASAKI PEACE DECLARATION
-------------------------------------------------
http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/02e/8_9/declaration/ndeclaration.html
-------------------------------------------------
August 6 - Hiroshima Day
By Chihaya
-------------------------------------------------
Hello Peace Makers,
On Wednesday, I went to the U.S. Consulate in Melbourne to join the Women For
Peace to protest, commemorating the Hiroshima Day.
There were about 15 of us, relatively small, but our presence was strong. I read
Charley and Nancy's letter ("A letter about a child in harm's way" www.mfso.org
), sang my songs - "Beyond the Boundary and Race" and "Requiem - though it was
just a beginning," and showed some books to my "comrades" that I've got from Hiroshima.
People at the Consulate, obviously didn't like us, and called the police to get
rid of us. But we managed to stay, convincing the police officers that we were
such a peaceful bunch - Reta, the head of the group was very good at it.
I thought to myself that we wouldn't have been there then only if the U.S. Governments
chose to face the facts, regretted what they'd done, and stopped doing the same
thing to others such as using DU(depleted uranium) and creating further more "compact"
nuclear weapons to KILL KILL KILL.
I was there for about a couple of hours (they were there from 10am to 4pm) and
went on to buy some Japanese food in the city with my placard hanging from my
neck at the front.
Many saw it, some nodded without saying a word.
One said in a shop, "Good sign! Very good!!" so I told him about the rally on
Nagasaki Day, which my daughter and I were to join, and he said, "Saturday? I'll
come!"
One guy working on a sidewalk, seemed interested, so I talked to him.
He asked me, if they didn't drop those a-bombs what would have happened i.e. they
could not stop the war unless they did. So I told him that towards the end, Japanese
were already exhausted and sick of war, so they were negotiating with Russians
to cease fire. That was because Japanese could not accept the condition that the
U.S. Government demanded, to get rid of our Emperor.
The U.S. Government didn't want Russians to take over Japan. And they had those
two different kinds of a-bombs just invented, and wanted to see how powerful they
could be.
That's the story.
That guy who went to South Africa as a soldier, seemed surprised. I believe he
only knew what they told him which is that Japanese were ready to fight further
more (probably true with some tops in the crazy military personnel) and the casualties
on both sides would have amounted to huge, which nowadays, some says that then
estimate was actually exaggerated.
And he asked me, "What about the war like the WWII? Can you leave someone like
Hitler alone?"
Well, there could be times when you have to interfere, but the important thing
is that we've got to detect when they are lying to us, and figure out the real
reasons behind the scene.
Also, there is no doubt that the weapons that keep harming and killing for generations
to come is the worst of all, and we should not allow anybody to use such weapons.
He agreed with me on that and said, "Nobody is a winner in war."
Although it didn't look like that he would come to join our rally on Nagasaki
Day, I certainly helped him see things in a different way, I hope.
Then I moved to Flinders Street Station, one of the main stations in Melbourne,
and stood in the middle of the road near a tram (streetcar) depot, holding the
sign to show to the pedestrians.
Many passed by with just a glance. But some were nodding, and one woman said to
me,
"GOOD on you!!"(=Good job) as she was passing by.
Another young man, whispered "If there is love, there will be peace" and walked
away.
So I shouted back saying, "Come to the rally!"
I thought about those who were killed in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Afghanistan, Iraq
and other places who could not even shout, "Don't kill me!!" before they killed
them.
I feel that I've got to shout for them. And sure I will!
Love and Peace,
Chihaya
>>page top
[news mail 04 Aug 03 ]
Mystery illness kills soldier
Dear friends,
Midori at the 'Children of the Gulf War' UK tour writing.
The day after tomorrow, 6th of August is the memorial day of Hiroshima. 58 years
ago, under the beautiful summer sky, Hiroshima had turned it into hell at one
moment. And three days after, 9th of August, the second nuclear bomb dropped in
Nagasaki.
Everything was burned down. Only the burnt fields were left. The death toll of
these cities has been 140 thousand in Hiroshima and seventy thousand in Nagasaki
during the four months period after the bombs were dropped that year.
People in Hiroshima and Nagasaki who escaped the bomb and death started to die
in the peaceful after-war Japan. In the 58 years after the nuclear bombs related
death has totaled more than 230 thousand in Hiroshima and 120 thousand in Nagasaki.
The two bombs dropped in August 1945 killed 350 thousand people. And the number
is still growing even now.
People who went to rescue a few days after the bombs are dropped also died. People
who were not even conceived were also killed. Just because Uranium235 which was
used in the bomb called "Little Boy" dropped in Hiroshima and Uranium 238 which
was used in the bomb "Fat Man" have affected the genes.
All people in Iraq, both Iraqi and the soldiers or peace workers came from other
countries are facing the risk of radiation of DU weapons.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Mystery illness kills Missouri soldier
Josh Neusche died Saturday; his family waits for answers.
By Eric Eckert News-Leader Staff
07/16/03 The Springfield News-Leader
Seventeen-year-old Jacob Neusche spent Tuesday morning packing up his big brother's
belongings; books, a high school letterman's jacket and a Class A uniform. "That's
what Josh will be buried in" the teenager said, referring to the uniform.
Missouri National Guard Spc. Josh Neusche, 20, died Saturday at the Homburg Hospital
in Germany from a mysterious illness. A member of the 203rd Engineer Battalion,
he is the only Missouri National Guardsman on the Department of Defense's casualty
list.
Family and friends are awaiting the soldier's body, scheduled to arrive Thursday
in the United States.
They are also waiting for autopsy results, and his parents, Mark and Cindy Neusche,
are calling for an investigation.
"He's always been healthy," Mark Neusche said. "Hell, he's a cross-country runner.
There's no reason for a boy of his health to deteriorate so quickly."
Cindy Neusche said her son collapsed July 2 while in Baghdad and was transported
to Germany. Doctors there told the family they believed Josh suffered from pneumonia
due to fluid that had collected on his lungs. But then his liver, kidneys and
muscles started to break down, his mother said.
"They were doing some things there, trying to get his kidneys flushed out," she
said through tears. "They told us his potassium levels came up so far and he needed
to go on dialysis."
The Neusches traveled to Germany Friday to be with their son. When they arrived,
they found him in a drug-induced coma. The grief-stricken couple weren't able
to talk with their boy, but they believe he knew they were there.
"In our hearts, we felt he heard us," said Cindy Neusche. "You could tell by the
machines he was on. His heart rate got faster when we talked to him."
Josh Neusche died the next day.
Doctors and family members are still befuddled by the strange illness. There's
got to be an explanation, Mark Neusche said. He prays the hospital's autopsy will
reveal the cause.
"I know the doctor over in Germany said he got into some type of toxin, " Mark
Neusche said. "Several soldiers were in similar conditions while we were there."
So far there has been no hint of an official inquiry.
"That's not under investigation," said U.S. Army Spokesman, Lt. Col. Jeff Keane,
from Virginia.
"To my knowledge, we've not been asked to do that (investigate)," added Whitney
Frost, a spokeswoman for U.S. Rep. Ike Skelton.
Meanwhile, friends and family have been reminiscing about their loved one.
To read more:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4130.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------
Mysterious Diseases Haunt U.S. Troops In Iraq
NATO experts attribute the mysterious symptoms suffered by U.S. soldiers
to the use of depleted uranium
BAGHDAD, July 17 IslamOnline.net & News Agencies
Several mysterious diseases were reported among a number of American troops within
the vicinity of Baghdad airport, a military source closely close to NATO unveiled.
U.S. soldiers deployed around Baghdad airport started showing symptoms of mysterious
fever, itching, scars and dark brown spots on the skin, the source, who refused
to be named, said in statements published Thursday, July 17, by the Saudi Al-Watan
newspaper.
He asserted that three soldiers who suffered these symptoms did not respond to
medical treatment in Iraqi hospitals and were flown to Washington for medication.
The military source reported a media blackout by U.S. officials to hide such information
from the public.
The Americans claim the symptoms and the mysterious diseases were resulting from
exposure to the scourging sun, which the U.S. troops are not used to, he added.
U.S. officials did not come up with an explanation for the symptoms, which NATO
experts tend to believe result from direct exposure to powerful nuclear radiations
of the sophisticated B-2 bombs used in the war on Iraq, particularly in striking
Iraqi Republican Guards forces who deployed to defend the vicinity of Baghdad
airport.
The military source stressed that the shrouds of secrecy imposed by American officials
on the issue were prompted by fears of creating waves of panic and anger among
the troops, particularly after announcements that American troops would remain
in Iraq indefinitely.
To read more:
http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2003-07/17/article03.shtml
>>page top
[news mail 03 Jul 03]
Mr. Morizumi's Iraq report
Dear friends,
Midori at the 'children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing.
Takashi Morizumi who is a photographer of the 'Children of the Gulf War' was back
to Japan from Iraq the end of last month. This was his 3rd visiting from the war
starting on March. He had sent some reports and photos during his latest visiting.
Following reports are some of them.
---------------------------------------------
Mr. Morizumi's Iraq report
[From Baghdad]
Received:19:51JST, 12/06/03
Yesterday I began a research on depleted uranium bombs and on contaminations at
the pillaged nuclear facilities. As for the Iraqi tanks, none was left in the
Baghdad city centre, having been cleared away by the American troops some two
days ago. But in areas that met heavy aerial bombardments, the radiation meter
indicated clearly abnormal levels.
The barrels containing yellow cakes - which Iraqi civilians had removed from the
Al-Tuwaitha nuclear facilities - were retrieved by the Americans, purchased at
three dollars a barrel. But the machine-like instruments used to mix yellow cakes
were left abandoned in a residential area, with traces of the substance showing
a radiation level one thousand times higher than the safety limit. Residents,
however, had not been informed of the danger; none of them knew the identity of
the substance. How could they, with no survey meter at their disposal?
Americans nor anybody else were dealing with the danger. I asked a passing policeman
to clear the barrels away.
-------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Morizumi's Iraq report
[Depleted uranium bombs discovered in Mahamadhia, the suburbs of Baghdad]
Received:22:56JST, 14/06/03
In Baghdad, I found a number of tanks destroyed by depleted uranium bombs. All
in residential districts. The residents were worried, but no information was forthcoming.
In today' Iraq, no one informs no one. Civilians must do what they can to protect
themselves. A sad state of affairs, for which Americans must assume the responsibility.
When I brought the survey meter to a crater created by depleted uranium bombs,
the warning signal kept on sounding. Nearby children were playing. I told the
residents to stay away, but they didn't understand the nature of the danger. You
don't feel anything when you're being contaminated by radiation. The fact that
you can't feel it makes the bombs even more insidious.
An Iraqi tank destroyed by depleted uranium bombs in a commercial district, some
35km southwest of Baghdad. It has been abandoned there for over two months. Residents
feel a vague sense of danger, but are helpless when it comes to actually having
it removed. There's no one to deal with this huge contaminated tank.
I've searching depleted uranium bombs everyday. The heat reaching fifty degrees
centigrade makes me feel dizzy. A siesta is essential during the day to preserve
energy. I become more and more aware of the extent to which depleted uranium bombs
were used. Today I went to Bellet, 150km northeast of Baghdad. It was here that
fights broke out three days ago that left forty American casualties. Recently
the Iraqi resistance against the American army is on the raise. The civilians
who chat with American soldiers by the day bring out their guns at night to attack
them. The resistance against the occupying forces will continue until the day
they leave.
(Translated by Jun Mori)
To read all and view photographs:
http://www.chimerafilms.co.uk/children6.html
>>page top
[news mail 02 Jul 03]
Deadly waste returned to US forces
Dear friends,
Midori at the 'children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing.
Following two articles came from the "Greenpeace International" homepage,
the latest news about Tuwaitha, Iraq. I had sent you news of the contamination
of the "yellowcake" at Tuwaitha two months ago. If you don't know about
that, please read the back issue titled "Al-Tuwaitha
turned into a Horrific Uranium-contamination Zone". The people who living
in that area need emergency support. Please read and spread it widely!
----------------------------------------
Deadly waste returned to US forces
Tue 24 June 2003 IRAQ/Baghdad
They claimed they were after weapons of mass destruction, but then allowed nuclear
material to be carried off by the barrel. They said errant nuclear waste poses
no health threat to the people in Iraq, but then denied access to experts. We
delivered a dose of reality to the occupying forces: villages surrounding the
Tuwaitha nuclear complex, just south of Baghdad, are contaminated with deadly
radiation. Clean up must begin now.
A convoy of vehicles bearing Greenpeace banners that read "Al Tuwaitha - nuclear
disaster - Act now!" with a single activist walking at its head, carrying a white
flag, returned a large uranium "yellow cake" mixing canister to the US military
guards stationed at the heart of the nuclear plant. The canister - the size of
a small car - contained significant quantities of radioactive "yellowcake" and
had been dumped on a busy section of open ground near the Tuwaitha plant. Despite
the military being aware of its presence, locals say it has been left open and
unattended for more than 20 days.
"If this had happened in the UK, the US or any other country, the villages around
Tuwaitha would be swarming with radiation experts and decontamination teams. It
would have been branded a nuclear disaster site and the people given immediate
medical check-ups. The people of Iraq deserve no less from the international community.
That they are being ignored is a scandal that must be rectified without delay,"
said Mike Townsley of Greenpeace International.(cont...)
To read more:
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/news/details?item_id=285508&print=1
-------------------------------
Radioactive barrel swap
Sat 28 June 2003 IRAQ/Baghdad
For many local people, the need for water storage overrides the unseen threat
of radioactivity. We took clean water containers into the communities around the
Tuwaitha nuclear facility near Baghdad and encouraged people to swap them for
their radioactive ones, contaminated with uranium "yellowcake".
Despite a US$3 a barrel offer from the US Army, many in the community have retained
the contaminated containers. Of the 500 barrels looted from the nuclear site since
the war, about 150 are still unaccounted for. A new barrel costs US$15.
The affected people are not organised criminals but the poorest of the poor, living
in chronic poverty after years of neglect and abuse at the hands of Saddam's regime
and a decade of crippling sanctions. We hope that by offering new barrels specifically
designed for water storage that we can return the last of the contaminated barrels
to the US military for safe-keeping inside the Tuwaitha site.
To read more:
http://www.greenpeace.org/news/details?item_id=288792
Greenpeace International homepage:
http://www.greenpeace.org/homepage/
>>page top
[news mail 01 Jul 03 ]
US troops 'shoot civilians'
Dear friends,
Midori at the 'children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing.
Have you already read the articles from the Evening Standard on 19th of June it
titled "US troops 'shoot civilians'"? I received it at about 10 days ago from
my friend living in the US. If you don't yet read it, please read the below. Was
the war really over?
------------------------------------------
US troops 'shoot civilians'
By Bob Graham in Baghdad, Evening Standard, 19 June 2003
American soldiers in Iraq today make the astonishing admission that they regularly
kill civilians.
In a series of disturbing interviews which throws light on the chaos gripping
the country, GIs also confess to leaving wounded Iraqi fighters to die, and even
to shooting injured enemy soldiers. They say they are frequently confronted by
fighters dressed as civilians, including women.
Their response is often to shoot first and ask questions later, even when it means
killing genuine civilians. Yesterday, US troops killed at least one man and injured
three others during a demonstration in Baghdad by former Iraqi soldiers protesting
at not being paid for two months. US troops first fired into the air and then
into the crowd after the demonstrators began throwing stones and bricks.
In the worsening cycle of violence, American tactics like these are feeding the
resentment of many Iraqis who object to the occupation of their country. US troops
are facing a growing number of hitandrun guerrilla attacks and more than 40 soldiers
have been killed since George Bush declared the war over seven weeks ago. (cont...)
The threat American soldiers feel was illustrated today when a coalition-run humanitarian
aid office north of Baghdad was shelled, killing one Iraqi worker and wounded
12. The attack represents a tactical shift by the guerillas as they target fellow
Iraqis deemed to be too close to the allies.
One of the soldiers interviewed by the Evening Standard, Specialist Anthony Castillo,
of the 3/15th US Infantry, said: "When there were civilians there, we did the
mission that had to be done. When they were there, they were at the wrong spot,
so they were considered enemy."
The soldiers are furious that their commanders have reneged on promises to send
them home as soon as the war was won and are now forcing them into the role of
peacekeepers.
The interviews will make troubling reading for US and British politicians and
senior military staff desperate to pacify the country and impose order before
a transfer to a civilian government run by Iraqis.
To read more:
http://www.thisislondon.com/news/articles/5401680?source=Evening%20Standard
-------------------------------------------
[full interview]
'I just pulled the trigger'
By Bob Graham, Evening Standard, in Baghdad 19 June 2003
At first glance they appear to be the archetypal Band Of Brothers of Hollywood
myth, brave and honest men united in common purpose.
But a closer look at these American GIs, sweltering in the heat of an unwelcoming
Iraq, reveals the glazed eyes and limp expressions of those who have witnessed
a war they do not understand and have begun to resent. By their own admission
these American soldiers have killed civilians without hesitation, shot wounded
fighters and left others to die in agony.
What they told me, in a series of extraordinary interviews, will make uncomfortable
reading for US and British politicians and senior military staff desperate to
prevent the liberation of Iraq turning into a quagmire of Vietnam proportions,
where the behaviour of troops feeds the hatred of an occupied people.
Sergeant First Class John Meadows revealed the mindset that has led to hundreds
of innocent Iraqi civilians being killed alongside fighters deliberately dressed
in civilian clothes. "You can't distinguish between who's trying to kill you and
who's not," he said. "Like, the only way to get through s*** like that was to
concentrate on getting through it by killing as many people as you can, people
you know are trying to kill you. Killing them first and getting home."
These GIs, from Bravo Company of the 3/15th US Infantry Division, are caught in
an impossible situation. More than 40 of their number have been killed by hostile
forces since 1 May - when President Bush declared major military operations were
over - and the number of hit-and-run attacks is on the increase. They face a resentful
civilian population and, hiding among it, a number of guerrilla fighters still
loyal to the old regime. A lone Iraqi sniper nicknamed The Hunter is believed
to have claimed his sixth American victim this week in a suburb of Baghdad.
The man, said to be a former member of the Republican Guard Special Forces, has
developed a cult status among some Iraqis. One Baghdad resident, Assad al Amari,
said: "He is fighting for Iraq on his own. There will be many more Americans killed
because they cannot stop The Hunter. He will be given the protection of people
who will let him use their homes for his shooting."
In this hostile atmosphere the men of Bravo Company are asked to maintain order,
yet at the same time win hearts and minds. It is not a dilemma they feel able
to resolve. They spoke to me - dressed in uniforms they have worn for the past
six weeks - at their base in Fallujah. Here US troops killed 18 demonstrators
at a pro-Saddam rally soon after the war and now face local fighters bent on revenge.
Their attitude to these dangers is summed up by Specialist (Corporal) Michael
Richardson, 22. "There was no dilemma when it came to shooting people who were
not in uniform, I just pulled the trigger. It was up close and personal the whole
time, there wasn't a big distance. If they were there, they were enemy, whether
in uniform or not. Some were, some weren't."
Specialist Anthony Castillo added: "When there were civilians there we did the
mission that had to be done. When they were there, they were at the wrong spot,
so they were considered enemy." In one major battle - at the southern end of Baghdad
at the intersection of the main highways - the soldiers estimate about 70 per
cent of the enemy's 400-or-so fighters were dressed as civilians.
Sgt Meadows explained: "The fight lasted for about eight hours and they just kept
on coming all day from everywhere, from all sides. They were all in plain clothes.
"We had dropped fliers a couple of days prior saying to people to get out of the
area if they didn't want to fight, so basically anyone who was there was a combatant.
If they were dumb enough to stand in front of tanks or drive a car towards a tank,
then they were there to fight. On that day it took away the dilemma of who to
fire at, anyone who was there was a combatant."
Cpl Richardson added: "That day nothing went with the training. There were females
fighting; there were some that, when they saw you f****** coming, they'd just
drop their s*** and try to give up; and some guys were shot and they'd play dead,
and when you'd go by they'd reach for their weapons. That day it was just f******
everything. When we face women or injured that try to grab their weapons, we just
finish them off. You've gotta, no choice."(cont..)
To read more:
http://www.thisislondon.com/news/articles/5402104
>>page top
[news mail 25 Jun 03]
Troops show uranium sickness signs
Dear friends,
Dr.Douglas Rokke who is a former US Army nuclear health
physicist, is in Australia for speech tour invited by the group who has organised
the 'Children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition in Australia.
Dr Rokke said Iraqi women and children and American and Iraqi military personnel
had reported respiratory illnesses and rashes after the recent conflict, and he
had also been told of Australian servicemen and women with similar symptoms.
Here is news from the ' Sydney Morning Herald' on 23rd of June 2003. The interview
with Dr Douglas Rokke at the Al Jazeera is following after that. It is quite long,
but it has value to read I believe.
----------------------------------------------------------
1) Troops show uranium sickness signs, claims expert
June 23 2003 Sydney Morning Herald
2) Depleted uranium will affect Iraq for generations to come
April 15 2003 Al Jazeera
-----------------------------------------------------------
1) Troops show uranium sickness signs, claims expert
AAP June 23 2003 Sydney Morning Herald
Australian servicemen and women who served in the recent Iraq war were reporting
symptoms of uranium sickness, a United States nuclear weapons expert said today.
Dr Douglas Rokke is a former US Army nuclear health physicist and was formerly
the Pentagon's expert on the health effects of depleted uranium ammunition.
Speaking in Melbourne today, Dr Rokke said Iraqi women and children and American
and Iraqi military personnel had reported respiratory illnesses and rashes after
the recent conflict, and he had also been told of Australian servicemen and women
with similar symptoms.
"That's the reports I received from the US Army medical department. That's something
that needs to be verified and looked into," he said.
"When American soldiers are sick and the Iraqis are sick there's nothing that
says an Australian soldier is going to be isolated when he goes through those
areas and he is not going to become ill. (cont...)
To read more:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/06/23/1056220529069.html
---------------------------------------------
2) Depleted uranium will affect Iraq for generations to come
April 15 2003 Al Jazeera
The Presenter (Ahmed Mansour): Despite research by a large number of scientists
and experts on the enormous damage inflicted by depleted uranium ... and the use
by the US in the Gulf War in 1991 , and wars in the Balkans and Afghanistan in
1994 ,1995 , 1999 and 2000 ... The US use of depleted uranium is not confined
to the total destruction of targets but extends to the destruction of the environment
and human life in general in the affected regions. Such areas will be unfit for
habitation for millions of years.
Our guest is professor Major Doug Rocke, former chief of Depleted Uranium Project
at the Pentagon.
Born in Illinois 1949 , professor Doug Rocke joined the US Air Force in 1967 ,
took part in the Vietnam War from 1969 to 1971 as a B52 pilot. He obtained his
PhD in nuclear physics. He worked until 1996 as a field doctor and specialist
in nuclear physics in the US Army. He took part in the 1991 Gulf War, tasked with
depleted uranium clean up in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.
From March to June 1991 , Prof Rocke compiled contaminated equipment from the
battlefield and shipped part of it back to the US and supervised the burial of
more equipment in Saudi Arabian deserts. He was appointed head of the Depleted
Uranium Project in the Pentagon between 1 August 1994 and November 1995 . He also
worked as a professor of nuclear physics at Jackson University - Alabama until
2000 .
Prof Rocke says he suffered the effects of depleted uranium from the first week
of the Gulf War in 1991 but did not realise it until March 1995. Tests showed
that he had 5000 times the normal level of radiation in his body, enough he says
sarcastically, to light up a small village. He is also suffering from problems
with breathing, immune system and one eye. He has had 15 surgical operations to
his liver as a result of his infection by this uranium syndrome.
Q: At this very critical time, a lot of people are trying to understand and know
more about the weapons containing depleted uranium which the United States plans
to use... Despite all the studies and research that came up during the last period
and confirmed the risks of using the depleted uranium, officials at the Pentagon
announced that they are going to use depleted uranium bombs in Iraq again. What
is your understanding of this announcement?
Professor Rocke: The announcement is very simple. Uranium munitions kill and destroy
everything that they contact. Going back to the (1991) Gulf War and even before,
the Pentagon had decided to use weapons that are absolutely efficient in combat.
At the completion of the 1991 Gulf War when I was specifically assigned to clean
up the uranium mess I received a memorandum, this is a Los Alamos memorandum written
by a colonel at Los Alamos national laboratories in New Mexico. In that memorandum,
he said "Even though we know there are health and environmental effects, you should
make sure that we can always use uranium munitions in combat because they are
so effective. And therefore lie about the health and environmental effects of
the use of uranium munitions in combat."
The Presenter: Being the former chief of the depleted uranium project in the Pentagon,
what are the risks of using depleted uranium on life and human beings in general?
Professor Rocke: The first thing that we have to understand is that each individual
uranium round fired by an Abrams tank is ten pounds of solid uranium contaminated
with plutonium, neptunium and americium. On impact, you have a fine uranium outside
dust that is generated. This represents about one half of the original mass. So
if you have 4500 grams, you have about 2300 grams or 2200 grams that turn into
a dust on the outside, they can be inhaled .. and then get into the body. When
this happens, you have all kinds of serious problems both metal poisoning and
radiological effects on the body.
The Presenter: Being one of the victims of depleted uranium, can you describe
the symptoms you felt when you were infected?
Professor Rocke: The most significant effect that we noticed was respiratory problems.
And the respiratory problems acted like you had a really bad case of bronchitis.
Your respiratory system was affected, you couldn't breathe as well and you started
noticing all kinds of serious apparatus effects with your breathing system. The
other health effect we saw immediately in ourselves and everybody else was the
terrible rash. And the rash that we suspect and which we still have to this day
is from the heavy metal poisoning that occurs just as if you would have eaten
a litre of any other heavy toxic metal.
The Presenter: Dr. Rocke, What are the most important symptoms of inhaling depleted
uranium?
Professor Rocke: The biggest problem that we had, in addition to the respiratory
problems, is cancer which developed in members of our team within eight to nine
months. Within two years, additional cancers developed and people started to die.
Individuals that we had confirmed had embedded uranium shrapnel deliberately locked
in their bodies by the United States Department of Defence did develop tumours
in and around that embedded shrapnel. Published research verifies that uranium
shrapnel or uranium embedded in the tissue will cause cancer. That we see in any
place that uranium has been used, manufactured and processed .... in various areas
of the United States.
The Presenter: But Michael Kilpatrick, who was responsible for providing medical
care to the veterans at the Pentagon, said in a press conference that a study
covering 90 infected veterans from the 1991 Gulf War proved that they were not
suffering from any disease, whether it be cancer or otherwise. What do you say
about this?
Professor Rocke: Dr. Kilpatrick lied to the world. It is very simple. First he
stated that 90 individuals were affected ..... I had well over 100 individuals
who were affected. I had another 250 individuals who were absolutely exposed while
we were cleaning it up.......
The Presenter: Why did your colleagues in the Pentagon lie and for the benefit
of whom?
Professor Rocke: The reason that they lie is to avoid any liability for the deliberate
use of uranium munitions not only in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, throughout the
Balkans and throughout all the sites in the United States. Again the purpose of
the war is to kill and to destroy. Uranium munitions are absolutely destructive.
(cont...)
To read more:
http://english.aljazeera.net/topics/article.asp?cu_no=1&item_no=2565&version=1&template_id=273&parent_id=258
>>page top
[news mail 30.05.03]
U.S. Colonel Admits 500 Tons of D.U. Were Used in Iraq
Dear friends,
Midori at the 'Children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing.
Following article came from Scoop.co.nz dated on 5th of May. Jay Shaft from the
'Coalition For Free Thought In Media' interviewed with an anonymous U.S. Special
Operations Command Colonel. The U.S. Colonel said ' I am aware of at least 500
tons of D.U. munitions that were used by combined coalition forces'. 500 tons
of D.U.!! are much more than the last time. Officially said the D.U. munitions
were used 230 tons during the last Gulf War 1991.
Thank you.
----------------------------------------
1) U.S. Colonel Admits 500 Tons of D.U. Were Used in Iraq
By Jay Shaft - Coalition For Free Thought In Media - 5 May 2003 Scoop.co.nz
In three separate interviews a U.S. Special Operations Command Colonel admitted
that the U.S. and Great Britain fired 500 tons of D.U. munitions into Iraq.
He has also informed me that the G.B.U.-28 BLU 113 Penetrator Bunker Buster 5000
pound bomb contains D.U. in the warhead. Until now, as far as I know, the materials
used to make the warhead of the G.B.U-28 have remained shrouded in mystery.
He also admitted that privately the Pentagon has acknowledged the health hazards
of D.U. for years.
He asked to remain unnamed for obviously apparent safety reasons, and so that
he may remain a valuable source of information. (I will admit that I will jealously
guard his identity to keep him as a source.)
I have verified his identity and that his information is mostly accurate.
Some things I could not verify due to top secret classifications of certain weapons.
The following is a transcript of questions I asked him. I will refer to him as
U.S.C. from here on.
J.S.: I understand you are a Colonel in the U.S. military, is that right?
U.S.C.: You are correct; I work for the U.S. Special Operations Command attached
to Central Command. My job is to plot coordinates for targets and decide what
is the best way to destroy the target. I have a large network of analysts at my
disposal to analyze each target and figure out what weapons would best destroy
it.
J.S.: Do you know how much D.U. was just used in Iraq, and what types of munitions
were used?
U.S.C.: Yes I am aware of at least 500 tons of D.U. munitions that were used by
combined coalition forces. I also know that many cities were heavily bombarded
with D.U. munitions.
J.S.: 500 tons? Are you absolutely sure?
U.S.C.: Oh, most sure on that matter. I know it was a little over 500 tons, but
you can round off your figures to the nearest hundred tons (chuckles).
J.S.: What about the cities? Did you deliberately use D.U. on them?
U.S.C.: Let's just say that we didn't do anything to avoid using D.U. in cities
or heavily populated areas. I know that I selected some D.U. bunker busters because
of the fact that they have a high penetration factor. I used D.U. weapons exclusively
on some targets so as to ensure maximum damage on those targets. You don't want
to just halfway destroy some targets, you want maximum damage.
J.S.: Hold on here, I didn't know that the Bunker Busters were D.U. How do you
know that? I have to make sure this is for real.
U.S.C.: Well the specs on the B.B.s are top secret, so good luck on verifying
it. To answer your question I will ask you one. How do you think they can penetrate
a steel hardened bunker with a bomb unit? There has to be D.U. in the warhead
or else you wouldn't get the penetration of the target that is buried underground.
J.S.: Oh I see your point. Well can you tell me which of the B.B.s have D.U. warheads?
U.S.C.: Well.......... (long pause) I think I will tell you about one and leave
it at that. The G.B.U.-28(guided bomb unit) BLU 113B 5000 pounder is capable of
being fitted with a D.U. warhead and dropped. It is not solely a D.U. warhead;
they still use them with conventional non-D.U. warheads. If you were watching
T.V. and you saw any bombs hit there was an easy way to tell if it was D.U. If
you saw all those little secondary white fires burning in the air in the blast:
that was D.U. burning off. D.U. burns with a whitish orange flame, almost looks
like a firework shell burning.
J.S.: Any other B.B.'s using D.U. warheads?
U.S.C.: I don't think I'll answer that, I've already said too much. Next question!
J.S.: Back to the 500 tons of D.U., did the D.O.D. / Pentagon deliberately target
civilian areas? And if they did, why?
U.S.C.: I answered that already, but I will tell you that there were a lot of
Iraqi armored vehicles in and around most major cities. Our own tanks and vehicles
use D.U. penetrator rounds to destroy those enemy vehicles. We are aware that
over 100 tons of D.U. munitions were used in and around Baghdad, but a lot more
fighting went on around the Northern cities and Basra. We knocked out over 20,000
different types of vehicles in Iraq, and even shelled buildings in downtown Baghdad
with D.U.
J.S.: The Pentagon knew this was happening? Did they try to stop it? You know,
because of the health risks of D.U. and the fact that we were supposed to be liberating
Iraq?
U.S.C.: They wanted complete destruction of any military vehicle in Iraq. That
was why you saw our vehicles shooting even the disabled and already shelled vehicles.
I have seen pictures of many vehicles with over 20 holes in them. The objective
was to make sure that there is no way that any fighting force could ever use those
vehicles in any way. We wanted to decimate the Iraqi army and make sure they were
never able to fight again. I think we achieved that objective quite well, more
so than we had hoped in such a short amount of time. This took an enormous amount
of ammunition, mostly D.U. tipped 25mm, 30mm, and 125mm penetrator rounds.
J.S.: What about the health risks that are associated with D.U.? Or do you deny
there are any?
U.S.C.: You are determined to get me to make a statement about the health risks
aren't you?
J.S.: If you will, I want to see what the behind the scenes view of D.U. is in
the Pentagon.
U.S.C.: Well**** (long pause, followed by heavy profanity). Okay, I'll give you
some dirt if that's what you're looking for. The Pentagon knows there are huge
health risks associated with D.U. They know from years of monitoring our own test
ranges and manufacturing facilities. There were parts of Iraq designated as high
contamination areas before we ever placed any troops on the ground. The areas
around Basra, Jalibah, Talil, most of the southern desert, and various other hot
spots were all identified as contaminated before the war. Some of the areas in
the southern desert region along the Kuwaiti border are especially radioactive
on scans and tests. One of our test ranges in Saudi Arabia shows over 1000 times
the normal background level for radiation. We have test ranges in the U.S. that
are extremely contaminated, hell they have been since the 80s and nothing is ever
said publicly. Don't ask don't tell is not only applied to gays, it is applied
to this matter very heavily. I know at one time the theory was developed that
any soldier exposed to D.U. shells should have to wear full MOP gear (the chemical
protective suit). But they realized that just wouldn't be practical and it was
never openly discussed again.
J.S.: So the stories that they know D.U. is harmful are true?
U.S.C.: Yes, there is no doubt that most high level commanders who were around
during the 80s know about it.
To read more:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0305/S00050.htm
- Jay Shaft, Editor: Coalition For Free Thought In Media
freethoughtinmedia@yahoo.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/coalitionforfreethoughtinmedia
----------------------------------------
2) U.S. Colonel/ I wrote the article, enough slander!
BY Jay Shaft / editor CFTM Fri May 9, 2003
Now, maybe we can discuss the article as it was actaully published. I am the author
of this article and did the interview with the U.S. Colonel. I have been bombarded
with hate mail ever since.
Since I did the interview I have talked to a few other high
level officers who also confirmed that D.U. is used in some B.B. warheads. I took
a great risk to print this article and am suffering greatly for it. I did not
realize the shitstorm this would start when I did the interview.
To be honest I wasn't conducting an interview about D.U. I was doing an interview
about civilian casualties and the D.U. topic just came up after the first interview.
It took me over an hour to conduct the last interview, and I was not going to
use it. I was convinced to print it by a lot of journalists who did not have the
courage to use it themselves.
To read more:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/du-watch/message/1854
>>page top
[news mail 28.05.03]
Rebecca Solnit on hope in dark times
Dear friends,
Midori at the 'Children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing.
Following articles came from Tom Dispach.com it titled 'Rebecca Solnit on hope
in dark times' dated on 19th of May. It is quite long. I am very pleased if you
enjoy the time to reading it.
Solnit said; 'Imagine the world as a lifeboat: the corporations and the current
administration are smashing holes in it as fast (or faster) than the rest of us
can bail or patch the leaks. But it's important to take account of the bailers
as well as the smashers and to write epics in the present tense rather than elegies
in the past tense. That's part of what floats this boat. And if it sinks, we all
sink, so why not bail? Why not row?'
Thank you,
------------------------------ ---------------------------
Tomgram: Rebecca Solnit on hope in dark times
by Tom Engelhardt 19 May 2003 Tom Dispach.com
You know how, out of the blue, someone can walk into your life? Sometimes, for
a book editor, a manuscript walks in the same way. Sometimes, for a reader, a
voice drifts in.
It happened to me recently, and it was the voice of Rebecca Solnit, arriving enfolded
in an essay about hope. Hope and consequences, you might say. It seemed to have
everything in it I've been wanting to say (but, for whatever reason, couldn't)
- or rather everything I've been feeling all of us needed to hear and hadn't.
"Activism", Solnit writes, "is not a journey to the corner store; it is a plunge
into the dark." Exactly. And history, she adds, "is like weather, not like checkers.
A game of checkers ends. The weather never does." At the end of a game, she might
have added, it's so simple. You tote up the score, sort out the winners and losers,
close up the board, and go on to something else. At a pause in history, as at
present, if you tote up the score, close up the board, and go home, you're making
a disastrous mistake.
A lot of the antiwar movement has done that in the wake of our second Iraq war.
And I don't blame them. All those people marching. All that opposition. And still
a war _ and look at the opinion polls now! But what's so beautiful about Solnit's
piece, the gorgeous writing aside, is that she wants us to stop adding up the
score in that game-like way. She wants us to acknowledge the darkness of our moment
and our world, but also realize that the score isn't in, that it can't be known.
Not ever. Not really. And then she wants us to make a wager, to take that leap
into the dark, and bet on hope. She wants that because we simply can't know the
consequences of our acts, a point she makes with particular grace.
The pleasure of having a weblog is that _ thanks, in this case, to the kindness
of an author and a magazine _ I can share with you the experience of that unexpected
stranger entering the room. Solnit, an activist (environmental and antinuclear)
as well as a writer, is the author most recently of River of Shadows: Eadweard
Muybridge and the Technological Wild West. But as for myself, I'm now reading
an older book of hers, a beauty called Savage Dreams: A Journey into the Landscape
Wars of the American West about, among other things, our dress rehearsals for
Armageddon, those atomic tests our government carried out above and then under
the Nevada desert from the 1950s into the 1990s (tests the Bush administration
wants to start up again).
Solnit is also a columnist for Orion, a twenty-one year old environmental magazine
that describes its task as exploring "an emerging alternative worldview. Informed
by a growing ecological awareness and the need for cultural change, it is a forum
for thoughtful and creative ideas and practical examples of how we might live
justly, wisely, and artfully on Earth." Orion, which has already posted
"Acts of Hope" at its site, and Solnit have together given me permission to publish
it as well. It's important. Please do read it and share it widely. Tom
---------------------------------------------
Acts of Hope - Challenging Empire on the World Stage
by Rebecca Solnit
"What We Hope For"
On January 18, 1915, six months into the first world war, the first terrible war
in the modern sense -- slaughter by the hundreds of thousands, poison gas, men
living and dying in the open graves of trench warfare, tanks, barbed wire, machine
guns, airplanes -- Virginia Woolf wrote in her journal, "The future is dark, which
is on the whole, the best thing the future can be, I think." Dark, she seems to
say, as in inscrutable, not as in terrible. We often mistake the one for the other.
People imagine the end of the world is nigh because the future is unimaginable.
Who twenty years ago would have pictured a world without the USSR and with the
Internet? We talk about "what we hope for" in terms of what we hope will come
to pass but we could think of it another way, as why we hope. We hope on principle,
we hope tactically and strategically, we hope because the future is dark, we hope
because it's a more powerful and more joyful way to live. Despair presumes it
knows what will happen next. But who, two decades ago, would have imagined that
the Canadian government would give a huge swathe of the north back to its indigenous
people, or that the imprisoned Nelson Mandela would become president of a free
South Africa?
Twenty-one years ago this June, a million people gathered in Central Park to demand
a nuclear freeze. They didn't get it. The movement was full of people who believed
they'd realize their goal in a few years and then go home. Many went home disappointed
or burned out. But in less than a decade, major nuclear arms reductions were negotiated,
helped along by European antinuclear movements and the impetus they gave Gorbachev.
Since then, the issue has fallen off the map and we have lost much of what was
gained. The US never ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, and the Bush
administration is planning to resume the full-fledged nuclear testing halted in
1991, to resume manufacture, to expand the arsenal, and perhaps even to use it
in once-proscribed ways.
It's always too soon to go home. And it's always too soon to calculate effect.
I once read an anecdote by someone in Women Strike for Peace, the first great
antinuclear movement in the United States, the one that did contribute to a major
victory: the 1963 end of aboveground nuclear testing with its radioactive fallout
that was showing up in mother's milk and baby teeth.
She told of how foolish and futile she felt standing in the rain one morning protesting
at the Kennedy White House. Years later she heard Dr. Benjamin Spock -- one of
the most high-profile activists on the issue then -- say that the turning point
for him was seeing a small group of women standing in the rain, protesting at
the White House. If they were so passionately committed, he thought, he should
give the issue more consideration himself.
"Unending Change"
A lot of activists expect that for every action there is an equal and opposite
and punctual reaction, and regard the lack of one as failure. After all, activism
is often a reaction: Bush decides to invade Iraq, we create a global peace movement
in which 10 to 30 million people march on seven continents on the same weekend.
But history is shaped by the groundswells and common dreams that single acts and
moments only represent. It's a landscape more complicated than commensurate cause
and effect. Politics is a surface in which transformation comes about as much
because of pervasive changes in the depths of the collective imagination as because
of visible acts, though both are necessary. And though huge causes sometimes have
little effect, tiny ones occasionally have huge consequences.
Some years ago, scientists attempted to create a long-range weather forecasting
program, assuming that the same initial conditions would generate the same weather
down the road. It turned out that the minutest variations, even the undetectable
things, things they could perhaps not yet even imagine as data, could cause entirely
different weather to emerge from almost identical initial conditions. This was
famously summed up as the saying about the flap of a butterfly's wings on one
continent that can change the weather on another.
History is like weather, not like checkers. A game of checkers ends. The weather
never does. That's why you can't save anything. Saving is the wrong word. Jesus
saves and so do banks: they set things aside from the flux of earthly change.
We never did save the whales, though we might've prevented them from becoming
extinct. We will have to continue to prevent that as long as they continue not
to be extinct. Saving suggests a laying up where neither moth nor dust doth corrupt,
and this model of salvation is perhaps why Americans are so good at crisis response
and then going home to let another crisis brew. Problems seldom go home. Most
nations agree to a ban on hunting endangered species of whale, but their oceans
are compromised in other ways. DDT is banned in the US, but exported to the third
world, and Monsanto moves on to the next atrocity.
The world gets better. It also gets worse. The time it will take you to address
this is exactly equal to your lifetime, and if you're lucky you don't know how
long that is. The future is dark. Like night. There are probabilities and likelihoods,
but there are no guarantees.
As Adam Hochschild points out, from the time the English Quakers first took on
the issue of slavery, three quarters of a century passed before it was abolished
it in Europe and America. Few if any working on the issue at the beginning lived
to see its conclusion, when what had once seemed impossible suddenly began to
look, in retrospect, inevitable. And as the law of unintended consequences might
lead you to expect, the abolition movement also sparked the first widespread women's
rights movement, which took about the same amount of time to secure the right
to vote for American women, has achieved far more in the subsequent 83 years,
and is by no means done. Activism is not a journey to the corner store; it is
a plunge into the dark.
Writers understand that action is seldom direct. You write your books. You scatter
your seeds. Rats might eat them, or they might just rot. In California, some seeds
lie dormant for decades because they only germinate after fire. Sharon Salzberg,
in her book Faith, recounts how she put together a book of teachings by
the Buddhist monk U Pandita and consigned the project to the "minor-good-deed
category." Long afterward, she found out that when Burmese democracy movement's
leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, was kept isolated under house arrest by that country's
dictators, the book and its instructions in meditation "became her main source
of spiritual support during those intensely difficult years." Emily Dickinson,
Walt Whitman, Walter Benjamin and Arthur Rimbaud, like Henry David Thoreau, achieved
their greatest impact long after their deaths, long after weeds had grown over
the graves of the bestsellers of their times. Gandhi's Thoreau-influenced nonviolence
was as important in the American South as it was in India, and what transpired
with Martin Luther King's sophisticated version of it has influenced civil disobedience
movements around the world. Decades after their assassinations they are still
with us.
At the port of Oakland, California, on April 7, several hundred peace activists
came out at dawn at dawn to picket the gates of a company shipping arms to Iraq.
The longshoreman's union had vowed not to cross our picket. The police arrived
in riot gear and, unprovoked and unthreatened, began shooting wooden bullets and
beanbags of shot at the activists. Three members of the media, nine longshoremen,
and fifty activists were injured. I saw the bloody welts the size of half grapefruits
on the backs of some of the young men--they had been shot in the back -- and a
swelling the size of an egg on the jaw of a delicate yoga instructor. Told that
way, violence won. But the violence inspired the union dock workers to form closer
alliances with antiwar activists and underscored the connections between local
and global issues. On May 12 we picketed again, with no violence. This time, the
longshoremen acted in solidarity with the picketers and -- for the first time
in anyone's memory -- the shipping companies cancelled the work shift rather than
face the protesters. Told that way, the story continues to unfold, and we have
grown stronger. And there's a third way to tell it. The picket stalled a lot of
semi trucks. Some of the drivers were annoyed. Some sincerely believed that the
war was a humanitarian effort.
Some of them -- notably a group of South Asian drivers standing around in the
morning sun looking radiant -- thought we were great. After the picket was broken
up, one immigrant driver honked in support and pulled over to ask for a peace
sign for his rig. I stepped forward to pierce holes into it so he could bungee-cord
it to the chrome grille. We talked briefly, shook hands, and he stepped up into
the cab. He was turned back at the gates --they weren't accepting deliveries from
antiwar truckers. When I saw him next he was sitting on a curb all alone behind
police lines, looking cheerful and fearless. Who knows what will ultimately come
of the spontaneous courage of this man with a job on the line?
"Victories of the New Peace Movement"
It was a setup for disappointment to expect that there would be an acknowledged
cause and effect relationship between the antiwar actions and the Bush administration.
On the other hand...
* We will likely never know, but it seems that the Bush administration decided
against the "Shock and Awe" saturation bombing of Baghdad because we made it clear
that the cost in world opinion and civil unrest would be too high. We millions
may have saved a few thousand or a few hundred thousand lives.
* The global peace movement was grossly underreported on February 15th. A million
people marching in Barcelona was nice, but I also heard about the thousands in
Chapel Hill, NC, the hundred and fifty people holding a peace vigil in the small
town of Las Vegas, NM, the antiwar passion of people in even smaller villages
from Bolivia to Thailand.
* Activists are often portrayed as an unrepresentative, marginal rabble, but something
shifted in the media last fall. Since then, antiwar activists have mostly been
represented as a diverse, legitimate, and representative body, a watershed victory
for our representation and our long-term prospects.
* Many people who had never spoken out, never marched in the street, never joined
groups, written to politicians, or donated to campaigns, did so; countless people
became political as never before. That is, if nothing else, a vast aquifer of
passion now stored up to feed the river of change. New networks and communities
and websites and listserves and jail solidarity groups and coalitions arose.
* In the name of the so-called war on terror, which seems to inculcate terror
at home and enact it abroad, we have been encouraged to fear our neighbors, each
other, strangers, (particularly middle-eastern, Arab, and Moslem people), to spy
on them, to lock ourselves up, to privatize ourselves. By living out our hope
and resistance in public together with strangers of all kinds, we overcame this
catechism of fear, we trusted each other; we forged a community that bridged all
differences among the peace loving as we demonstrated our commitment to the people
of Iraq.
* We achieved a global movement without leaders. There were many brilliant spokespeople,
theorists and organizers, but when your fate rests on your leader, you are only
as strong, as incorruptible, and as creative as he -- or, occasionally, she --
is. What could be more democratic than millions of people who, via the grapevine,
the Internet, and various groups from churches to unions to direct-action affinity
groups, can organize themselves? Of course leaderless actions and movements have
been organized for the past couple of decades, but never on such a grand scale.
The African writer Laurens Van Der Post once said that no great new leaders were
emerging because it was time for us to cease to be followers. Perhaps we have.
* We succeeded in doing what the anti-Vietnam War movement infamously failed to
do: to refuse the dichotomies. We were able to oppose a war on Iraq without endorsing
Saddam Hussein. We were able to oppose a war with compassion for the troops who
fought it. Most of us did not fall into the traps that our foreign policy so often
does and that earlier generations of radicals did: the ones in which our enemy's
enemy is our friend, in which the opponent of an evil must be good, in which a
nation and its figurehead, a general and his troops, become indistinguishable.
We were not against the US and for Iraq; we were against the war, and many of
us were against all war, all weapons of mass destruction -- even ours -- and all
violence, everywhere. We are not just an antiwar movement. We are a peace movement.
* Questions the peace and anti-globalization movements have raised are now mainstream,
though no mainstream source will say why, or perhaps even knows why. Activists
targeted Bechtel, Halliburton, Chevron and Lockheed Martin, among others, as war
profiteers with ties to the Bush administration. The actions worked not by shutting
the places down in any significant way but by making their operations a public
question. Direct action seldom works directly, but now the media scrutinizes those
corporations as never before. Representative Henry Waxman publicly questioned
Halliburton's ties to terrorist states the other day, and the media is closely
questioning the administration's closed-door decision to award Halliburton, the
company vice-president Cheney headed until he took office, a $7 billion contract
to administer Iraqi oil. These are breakthroughs.
To read more:
http://www.nationinstitute.org/tomdispatch/index.mhtml?emx=x&pid=677
------------------------------
This article first appeared on OrionOnline.org
To see Orion magazine's illustrated version of the piece click below.
http://www.oriononline.org/pages/oo/sidebars/Patriotism/index_Solnit.html
Or if you would simply like to sample Orion's website, go to www.oriononline.org.
------------------------------
>>page top
[news mail 06 May 03]
Veterans claim Gulf syndrome victory
Dear friends,
Midori at the 'Children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing. I was
back home from Japan at about 10 days ago. The next exhibition will be setting
up at the Goldsmith Collage from 19th of May. I will send you further information
soon.
I have found the article below about the Gulf War Syndrome today. It said 'the
Ministry of Defence announced it would not appeal against a ruling by the war
pensions tribunal accepting a link between the condition and vaccinations given
to the armed forces.' on that article. I believe without any question that is
very good news for the veterans who are suffering from the syndrome.
But then I have some questions, is the cause of the syndrome only vaccinations?
Are they suffering from the DU weapons as well? Do the government want hiding
the consequence of the DU weapon it used last March on the people of Iraq again?
What do you think about that?
Please read below.
-----------------------------------------------------
Veterans claim Gulf syndrome victory
MoD will not challenge ruling that links illness to vaccinations
By Jamie Wilson
Tuesday May 6, 2003 The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,950107,00.html
Gulf war syndrome campaigners were yesterday claiming victory after the Ministry
of Defence announced it would not appeal against a ruling by the war pensions
tribunal accepting a link between the condition and vaccinations given to the
armed forces.
Alex Izett, 33, a former lance corporal who developed brittle bone disease after
the 1991 conflict despite never going to the Gulf, said it was a "watershed" moment
in the battle to have the condition officially recognised.
The decision by the MoD not to challenge the ruling that Mr Izett's osteoporosis
was caused by a cocktail of drugs before his planned deployment could have significant
implications for hundreds of veterans who claim they are suffering from the syndrome.
The National Gulf War Veterans Association, which is calling for a public inquiry,
said it was "an outstanding victory".
Because Mr Izett did not go to the Gulf the ruling adds weight to the veterans'
argument that their ailments have been caused by the injections they were given
and not by anything they may have encountered in the field.
Charles Plumridge, spokes- man for the National Gulf War Veterans Association,
said: "We are now calling on the MoD to officially confirm that we are ill because
of the inoculations we were given.
"The MoD has consistently said there is no scientific or medical evidence that
we are ill - surely this judgment provides the medical evidence that we are ill
as we claimed."
But the defence minister, Lewis Moonie, insisted there was still no proof that
vaccinations were to blame for veterans' ill-health. He said the ruling was not
being appealed because there were no legal grounds under which the MoD could challenge
the ruling. "There is no medical evidence whatsoever to support that. The tribunal
finding accepted that we could not prove that the ill-health was not due to the
injections. That is a very, very different thing," he told the Today programme
on Radio 4.
But Hilary Meredith, a solicitor who represents a number of Gulf war veterans
claiming compensation, said it would be very difficult for the MoD to say that
Gulf war syndrome does not exist when their own war pension says it does.
In Britain more than 3,000 veterans have reported symptoms of Gulf war syndrome
with 1,100 receiving a war pension for illnesses linked to Gulf service. 571 British
veterans have died, some from rare brain disorders and cancers.
The Liberal Democrat MP, Paul Tyler, a member of the Royal British Legion Gulf
War Group, said: "The MoD has been in a state of deplorable denial. While US service
personnel were properly treated, ours were accused of imagining their serious
illnesses. We could not even be sure that those deployed in the recent Iraq war
were avoiding the same problems - from a cocktail of injections - suffered in
the first Gulf war in 1991."
Mr Izett, who lives in Bersenbruck in Germany, has suffered from osteoporosis
for the last eight years and takes various a cocktail of anti-depressants and
painkillers. "I'm in pain on a daily basis," he said. "But this finally proves
that they made us ill."
He said the decision to give soldiers untested drugs in the first conflict was
a mistake, and to do it in the run-up to the latest conflict was a "crime".
He added: "They still haven't learned. We already know of three cases where soldiers
fighting in this war have come down ill because of the inoculations and it's disgusting
for it to be happening again."
>>page top
[news mail 20 Apr 03]
"Al-Tuwaitha turned into a Horrific Uranium-contamination Zone"
Dear friends,
Midori again. I have received a following email today from my Japanese friend,
Ms Y Maruta who is a member of the TUP/Translators United for Peace. Here is an
important dispatch for you on a serious radio-active contamination at al-Tuwaitha,
Iraq, as the villagers there have looted dozens of drums of yellow cake, uranium
powder, and emptied out them in order to utilize drums for daily needs such as
drinking water storage.
Midori
I received an appalling report from JAPAN. Mr. Hisataka Yamazaki, a member of
the Depleted Uranium Study Group, reported the nuclear contamination at al-Tuwaitha,
Iraq. He is particularly condemning the coalition forces for their lack of responsibility
as an occupation army, who should now be in charge of the health and welfare of
Iraq people.
As long as I know, this incident has been not widely reported in U.S and other
coalition countries. If any, their reports tend to focus on the fear of nuclear
proliferation.
(1) Break-in fear at nuclear store - UN seals broken at nuclear bomb plant:
We are worried over what happens if anyone has taken radioactive material (April
11 2003 The Guardian)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,934486,00.html
(2) Looters at key Iraqi nuke site terrify residents (May 8 2003, AFP)
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/05/07/1052280324928.html
(3) Nuclear watchdog fears terrorist dirty bomb after looting at al-Tuwaitha (May
14, 2003)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,955374,00.html
His report is based on the Asahi News Flash of May 7, the Kyodo News Flash of
May 11, and Fuji TV Midnight News (They are all reliable Japanese big media).
The following is a translation from his original report. (Translated by Y Maruta)
-------------------------------------------------------
"Al-Tuwaitha, Iraq: the Iraq Nuclear Complex Turned into a Horrific Uranium-contamination
Zone"
Hisataka Yamazaki (Depleted Uranium Center/Japan) Saturday May 11, 2003
This is a horrific news - the scene of yellow-cake (i.e.refined uranium ore) contamination
at al-Tuwaitha, Iraq. The news was on air as a part of the Fuji TV Midnight News
program. I saw US troops with a Geiger counter guiding reporters in the al-Tuwaitha
Nuclear Complex while a running telop reads "the counter records 700 times as
high as the background radiation value"
What happened there?
At the al-Tuwaitha Nuclear Complex, the largest nuclear facility in Iraq, dozens
of drums containing natural uranium called "yellow cake" were looted and their
contents were discarded all over the site. Nuclear contamination due to the discarded
uranium has been expanding into neighboring residential area and beyond. The looters
did not want to steal uranium, but the drums! For them, uranium was just useless
material.
Yellow cake is refined uranium ore, which contains not only natural uranium but
also thorium, radium, radon and other radioactive elements that occur in the uranium
decay process. Among them, radon is gaseous, so that its high-concentration gas
may have filled the warehouse in which yellow cake had been stored for a long
time. The looters invaded this building. They must have been exposed to and severely
affected by this radioactive contamination.
It is very dangerous to approach such a contaminated site. To my dismay, the guiding
US troops and our reporters from Fuji TV were all without protection; no mask,@no
protection gear. They approached the entrance of the warehouse. Around its slightly
opened door, I saw a heap of yellow cake discarded. It looked like that the US
army stationed there had not done anything about it.
The scene changed to an interview with a family in a neighboring town, who claimed
that they had stored water in one of those looted yellow-cake drums. The drum
was no longer there, but their small children started to get rashes all over their
bodies; the symptom of uranium's metallic toxin. This symptom was also claimed
by their grown-ups . Clearly, the situation is very serious.
At the al-Tuwaitha complex, there are many eroded drums with holes, discarded
in the open. Because they look like they have not been under supervision for a
long time, they may contain nuclear waste. If no protective measures are taken,
the waste will contaminate soil as well as deep underground water.
According to this TV report and the Asahi/Kyodo news flashes, such contamination
did not occur when the Iraq army was in charge. It looks like the looting occurred
after the Iraq army ran away with the US army approaching. But, this explanation
is not plausible. It is reported that there were about 1,000 nuclear engineers
at that time and a small amount of looting could not cause such devastation. It
is probable that when the US army invaded the complex, they broke the security
system and after that they took no measures. So, there was no way to prevent armed
residents from looting the complex. This is one of the war crimes committed by
the US forces in Iraq.
There is another point of view for this incident. The al-Tuwaitha complex was
the center of the Iraq nuclear program and has kept various facilities necessary
to operate the nuclear reactor destroyed in the 1981 bombing by Israel. So, if
Iraq had wanted to make atomic bombs, the complex would have been the center of
the operations. Why did the US army take no measure to prevent looting at the
place in which the wanted WMDs were most likely hidden? We can draw the conclusion
that the search for WMDs was just a convenient excuse to fend off the international
opposition to the Iraq invasion.
Although yellow cake is useless without enrichment, it should be strictly supervised
as material for nuclear weapons. But, the US forces took no measure, leaving it
to be looted. This cannot be excused. They are heavily responsible for this possible
nuclear proliferation, along with the radioactive exposure mentioned above.
Finally, I want to make an important point about this incident. Yellow cake and
depleted uranium (DU) are both dangerous radioactive materials. It is possible
that the official US claim that DU is not dangerous has led to this irresponsible
treatment of yellow cake in al-Tuwaitha. That is, because the US forces have denied
the danger of DU and used it all over Iraq, they cannot or don't want to emphasize
to their troops the danger of yellow cake. They cannot or don't want to take any
measures related to this incident.
Consequently, the same symptoms that Mr. Douglas Rokke@described about DU related
disorders will spread among@residents in al-Tuwaitha. Already, many cases of
skin@rash have been reported. It is predictable that respiratory-organ and whole-body
symptoms, like@multiple-organ disorders, peripheral-nerve paralysis,@asthma,
and dyspnea, will increase and frequent@occurrences of cancers will be reported
in the long run.
Immediate measures to be taken include collecting anything@contaminated, such
as yellow cake scattered over the@complex and drums brought out of the site,
removing@contaminated soil, relocating and conducting health checks@on the residents
of the contaminated areas, and giving@medical treatments to those with any symptoms.
The@occupation army is definitely responsible for these@measures. Financial
aid is also necessary because people@in the al-Tuwaitha area have no means of
making a living@outside of there.
Even if those reports give only a bit of information, we@are at least informed
that not only DU contamination but@also this type of nuclear contamination is
spreading in@Iraq. However, the residents of the contaminated areas@are left
uninformed. This is also not excusable.
(For more information, please contact Mt. Yamazaki at SDI00872@nifty.com)
---------------------------------------------
Iraq looters exposed to radioactive yellow cake
By TSUYOSHI NOJIMA, The Asahi Shimbun
They wanted water containers; they may have killed the village.
Iraq-Villagers looted a nuclear power facility here during the waning days of
the war and instead of treasure, may have made off with death-drums filled with
radioactive uranium oxide concentrate, also called yellow cake.
According to officials with the Iraq nuclear energy commission, the storage facility
at Zafaraniya was guarded by Iraqi troops until April 4. However, they fled in
the face of approaching U.S. Marines.
With the arrival of the Marines, the Zafaraniya facility was nominally under control
of U.S. forces. However no special guards were posted and residents of a neighboring
village looted the facility on April 6 and 7.
Most of the villagers have only an elementary school education. While they knew
the facility was related to nuclear energy, they did not know that radioactive
materials were stored there. By April 8, when Iraq nuclear energy commission officials
got a handle on the situation, they discovered about 100 drums containing yellow
cake were missing.
It appears the villagers did not know what the yellow cake was nor had any interest
in it. With only about 60 households, the village did not have piped-in water
and the looters wanted to use the drums for water storage.
In what may prove to be deadly errors, they dumped the radioactive substance on
land near their village and washed the drums in a local river.
Officials believe the looters inevitably inhaled large quantities of the uranium.
To make a bad situation worse, the villagers may have ingested radioactive material
after converting the drums to water and cooking oil containers.
Yellow cake is produced when refining uranium ore. Through further processing,
it can be used as fuel rods for nuclear reactors or in nuclear weapons. An official
with the Iraq nuclear energy commission said Iraq refined the uranium from imports
from Nigeria and Portugal in 1978 for its nuclear development program. About 300
drums of refined uranium had been in storage at Zafaraniya for about 20 years.
The site was visited last January and February by inspectors from the U.N. Monitoring,
Verification and Inspection Commission and the International Atomic Energy Agency.
The inspectors found no safety problems at the facility.
The Zafaraniya facility is located about 30 kilometers southeast of Baghdad and
includes an experimental nuclear reactor and research labs.
To read more:
http://www.asahi.com/english/international/K2003050800179.html
>>page top
[news mail 18 Apr 03]
Free to commit crimes and do bad things
Dear friends,
How are you?
Midori at the Children of the Gulf War photo exhibition UK tour writing. I'm still
in Japan. It was sunny and hot day today. Following news mail are about the looters
in Iraq. I have imagined you already hear and read lots of news about that. But
you can find some different points of view about the looters from the below. If
you don't want such a news email from me, please let me know. I will remove your
email address from my mailing list.
-------------------------------
1. Free to do bad things
By Brian Whitaker April 12 2003 The Guardian
2. Library books, letters and priceless documents are set ablaze in final chapter
of the sacking of Baghdad
By Robert Fisk 15 April 2003 The Independent
3. US Troops Encouraged Ransacking
By Ole Rothenborg 11 April 2003 Dagens Nyheter (Sweden's newspaper)
4. Americans defend two untouchable ministries from the hordes of looters
By Robert Fisk in Baghdad 14 April 2003 The Independent
5. Iraq Diaries - Other Hearts
By Kathy Kelly, Iraq Peace Team 15 April 2003
-------------------------------
1. Free to do bad things
By Brian Whitaker April 12 2003 The Guardian
On one of the bleakest days since the invasion began, US defence secretary Donald
Rumsfeld yesterday shrugged off turmoil and looting in Iraq as signs of the people's
freedom.
"It's untidy, and freedom's untidy," he said, jabbing his hand in the air. "Free
people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things. They're
also free to live their lives and do wonderful things."
"The images you are seeing on television you are seeing over, and over, and over,
and it's the same picture of some person walking out of some building with a vase,
and you see it 20 times, and you think, 'My goodness, were there that many vases?
Is it possible that there were that many vases in the whole country?' "
To read more:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/dailybriefing/story/0,12965,935381,00.html
-------------------------------
2. Library books, letters and priceless documents are set ablaze in final chapter
of the sacking of Baghdad
By Robert Fisk 15 April 2003 The Independent
So yesterday was the burning of books. First came the looters, then the arsonists.
It was the final chapter in the sacking of Baghdad. The National Library and Archives
- a priceless treasure of Ottoman historical documents, including the old royal
archives of Iraq - were turned to ashes in 3,000 degrees of heat. Then the library
of Korans at the Ministry of Religious Endowment was set ablaze.
I saw the looters. One of them cursed me when I tried to reclaim a book of Islamic
law from a boy of no more than 10. Amid the ashes of Iraqi history, I found a
file blowing in the wind outside: pages of handwritten letters between the court
of Sharif Hussein of Mecca, who started the Arab revolt against the Turks for
Lawrence of Arabia, and the Ottoman rulers of Baghdad.
And the Americans did nothing. All over the filthy yard they blew, letters of
recommendation to the courts of Arabia, demands for ammunition for troops, reports
on the theft of camels and attacks on pilgrims, all in delicate hand-written Arabic
script. I was holding in my hands the last Baghdad vestiges of Iraq's written
history. But for Iraq, this is Year Zero; with the destruction of the antiquities
in the Museum of Archaeology on Saturday and the burning of the National Archives
and then the Koranic library, the cultural identity of Iraq is being erased. Why?
Who set these fires? For what insane purpose is this heritage being destroyed?
When I caught sight of the Koranic library burning - flames 100 feet high were
bursting from the windows - I raced to the offices of the occupying power, the
US Marines' Civil Affairs Bureau. An officer shouted to a colleague that "this
guy says some biblical [sic] library is on fire". I gave the map location, the
precise name - in Arabic and English. I said the smoke could be seen from three
miles away and it would take only five minutes to drive there. Half an hour later,
there wasn't an American at the scene - and the flames were shooting 200 feet
into the air.
To read more:
http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=397350
-------------------------------
3. US Troops Encouraged Ransacking
By Ole Rothenborg 11 April 2003 Dagens Nyheter (Sweden's newspaper)
[This is a translation of an article from April 11 from Dagens Nyheter, Sweden's
largest newspaper, based in Stockholm. The article was written by Ole Rothenborg
and translated by Joe Valasek.]
Khaled Bayomi, has taught and researched on Middle Eastern conflicts for ten years
at the University of Lund where he is also working on his doctorate. He has given
his permission for this interview to be widely disseminated. Khaled Bayomi looks
surprised when the American officer on TV complains that they don't have the resources
to stop the plundering in Baghdad. "I happened to be right there just as the American
troops encouraged people to begin the plundering."
Khaled Bayomi traveled from Europe to Baghdad to be a human shield and arrived
on the same day that the war began. About this he can tell many stories but the
most interesting is certainly his eyewitness account of the wave of plundering.
"I had gone to see some friends who live near a dilapidated area just past Haifa
Avenue on the west bank of the Tigris. It was the 8th of April and the fighting
was so intense that I was unable to return to the other side of the river. In
the afternoon it became perfectly quiet and four American tanks took places on
the edge of the slum area. The soldiers shot two Sudanese guards who stood at
their posts outside a local administration building on the other side of Haifa
Avenue. Then they blasted apart the doors to the building and from the tanks came
eager calls in Arabic encouraging people to come close to them. "
"The entire morning, everyone who had tried to cross the road had been shot. But
in the strange silence after all the shooting, people gradually became curious.
After 45 minutes, the first Baghdad citizens dared to come out. Arab interpreters
in the tanks told the people to go and take what they wanted in the building."
"The word spread quickly and the building was ransacked. I was standing only 300
yards from there when the guards were murdered. Afterwards the tank crushed the
entrance to the Justice Department, which was in a neighboring building, and the
plundering continued there".
"I stood in a large crowd and watched this together with them. They did not partake
in the plundering but dared not to interfere. Many had tears of shame in their
eyes. The next morning the plundering spread to the Modern Museum, which lies
a quarter mile farther north. There were also two crowds there, one that plundered
and one with watched with disgust."
"Are you saying that it was US troops who initiated the plundering?"
"Absolutely. The lack of jubilant scenes meant that the American troops needed
pictures of Iraqis who in different ways demonstrated hatred for Saddam's regime."
To read more:
http://truthout.org/docs_03/041603D.shtml
Dagens Nyheter site:
http://www.dn.se/
-------------------------------
4. Americans defend two untouchable ministries from the hordes of looters
By Robert Fisk 14 April 2003 The Independent
Iraq's scavengers have thieved and destroyed what they have been allowed to loot
and burn by the Americans - and a two-hour drive around Baghdad shows clearly
what the US intends to protect. After days of arson and pillage, here's a short
but revealing scorecard. US troops have sat back and allowed mobs to wreck and
then burn the Ministry of Planning, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of
Irrigation, the Ministry of Trade, the Ministry of Industry, the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Information. They did nothing
to prevent looters from destroying priceless treasures of Iraq's history in the
Baghdad Archaeological Museum and in the museum in the northern city of Mosul,
or from looting three hospitals.
The Americans have, though, put hundreds of troops inside two Iraqi ministries
that remain untouched - and untouchable - because tanks and armoured personnel
carriers and Humvees have been placed inside and outside both institutions. And
which ministries proved to be so important for the Americans? Why, the Ministry
of Interior, of course - with its vast wealth of intelligence information on Iraq
- and the Ministry of Oil. The archives and files of Iraq's most valuable asset
- its oilfields and, even more important, its massive reserves - are safe and
sound, sealed off from the mobs and looters, and safe to be shared, as Washington
almost certainly intends, with American oil companies.
To read more:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=396997
-------------------------------
5. Iraq Diaries - Other Hearts
By Kathy Kelly, Iraq Peace Team 15 April 2003
I met Hisham at the Baghdad School of Folk Music and Ballet, in January 2002.
Hisham and Majid, both graduates of the school, taught there in the daytime and
then rehearsed with the orchestra at night. Knowing how busy Hisham was, I felt
presumptuous about suggesting a project for him and his students. I told him how
meaningful the song "O Finlandia" has been to many people in the US. At least
150 families who lost loved ones on 9/11 had used this peace anthem as part of
memorial services. Sibelius composed the melody in the late 19th century. Following
World War I, lyrics were created emphasizing the common aspirations and dreams
shared by all humanity.
Hisham chuckled and couldn't resist pointing out the irony that someone from the
US wanted to teach his students a peace song. "O.K.," said he, "Sing it for me.
We can do this." Within two days, an entire class was singing an Arabic transliteration
of the song.
Saying goodbye to Majid and Hisham, that morning, I felt a wave of sadness, wondering
if the hopeful, idealistic verses might embitter them now.
The next morning they returned, shaken and distraught. They had approached US
soldiers the previous evening asking for help to protect their school. The soldiers
said it was not their job and ordered Hisham and Majid to go away. They went to
the entrance of the school hoping they could somehow protect it alone. Five armed
men arrived. Majid, Hisham and Hisham's brother pled with them not to attack the
school. The looters argued, "We are simple people. Poor people. Soon there will
be no food, no money, and we have no jobs. You are rich people."
"Please," Majid said, "we will give you the instruments, give you the furniture,
but don't destroy the music, the records, the history." "No," the armed men said.
"Baghdad is finished." They ransacked the school, broke many instruments, burnt
the music and the records.
"Here," Hisham said, "listen to this. This is all we have left." He handed me
headphones borrowed from a Norwegian television correspondent. The orchestra was
playing "O Finlandia." Listening to the children craft their music, I softly sang
the words: "This is my song, O God of all the nations. A song of peace for lands
afar and mine. This is my home, the country where my heart is. Here are my dreams,
my hopes, my holy shrine. But other hearts in other lands are beating, with hopes
and dreams as deep and true as mine." Then I stopped. Hisham had begun to cry.
To read more:
http://electronicIraq.net/news/653.shtml
>>page top
[news mail 15 Apr 03]
Image-making, lies and the "liberation" of Iraq
Dear friends,
Midori at the Children of the Gulf War UK tour writing. How are you? I am sending
this news mail using my temporally mail address instead of my usually one, because
I am in Japan now. I can't send an email from my account but I can receive it
at midori@dircon.co.uk.
----------------------------------------
The stage-managed events in Baghdadfs Firdos Square:
image-making, lies and the "liberation" of Iraq
By Patrick Martin
12 April 2003 World Socialist Web Site www.wsws.org
Several photographs publicized by an antiwar web site shed light on the way the
American media is manipulating images of the war in Iraq to give the false impression
that the vast majority of the Iraqi people are joyfully welcoming the invasion
and occupation of their country by US and British troops.
These photographs, available on the web site of Information Clearing House http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2842.htm
show that the toppling of a statue of Saddam Hussein in Firdos Square, given massive
publicity in the US and international media April 9-10, was a stage-managed affair.
As transmitted to the world by US television and newspaper reports, the pictures
from Firdos Square purported to show a mass of enthusiastic Iraqis hailing the
US military and trampling on a gargantuan bronze statue of Saddam Hussein. Hours
of television time and pages of newspaper coverage were devoted to these pictures,
with accompanying commentary comparing the scene to the bringing down of the Berlin
Wall in 1989 and the liberation of Paris in 1944.
The first photograph on the Information Clearing House site is a wide-angle shot
encompassing the entire expanse of Firdos Square, rather than the narrowly focused,
closely cropped framing used in the mass media. It shows that the gcrowdh surrounding
the statue of Saddam Hussein is anything but massive, and that the square itself
has been surrounded by US Abrams tanks, cutting it off from the rest of the city.
Clearing House site
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2842.htm
The caption supplied by the site notes that Firdos Square is across the street
from the Palestine Hotel, where most international journalists based in Baghdad
are located, a fact that even the Washington Postfs TV critic noted was geither
splendid luck or brilliant planning on the part of the military.h Of the 200
or so assembled, the majority were journalists and American soldiers. The BBC
reported that only gdozensh of Iraqis were involved.
Who those dozens were is suggested by two additional photographs published below
the wide-angle photo. They show the arrival from exile of the Pentagonfs handpicked
Iraqi gleader,h Ahmed Chalabi, in Nasiriya on April 6, accompanied by several
aides, and a close-up of one of the participants in the April 9 statue demolition
scene in Baghdad. It is clear from the two pictures that the man celebrating gliberationh
in Baghdad was one of those accompanying Chalabi into Nasiriya three days earlier.
The significance of this should be clear: those who gspontaneouslyh gathered
in Firdos Square included Iraqi political agents of the American military, dispatched
from Nasiriya to Baghdad to serve as an appropriate backdrop for the visuals desired
by Bush administration spin doctors. If not gWag the Dog,h it is at least a
case of grent a crowd.h Or, as Robert Fisk of the British newspaper the Independent
described it, gthe most staged photo-opportunity since Iwo Jima.h
To a critical observer, the live coverage from Firdos Square had already suggested
that there was less than met the eye to the scenes of universal rejoicing. Even
this small and controlled crowd fell silent and muttered its disapproval when
a US Marine initially draped the statuefs head with an American flag. An Iraqi
onlooker supplied one of his own countryfs flags, and there were cheers when
this replaced the Stars and Stripes.
<