>>>back to main page
>>>back issues-2004

news mail -2003 <English>


<contents>
[news mail 06 Dec 03 ] The Peace Constitution
[news mail 02 Oct 03] Lone Diplomat Standing for Truth
[news mail 26 Sep 03 ]The Toxic Legacy of the Iraq War
[news mail 12 Aug 03] 2003 Hiroshima Peace Declaration
[news mail 04 Aug 03] Mystery illness kills soldier
[news mail 03 Jul 03] Mr. Morizumi's Iraq report
[news mail 02 Jul 03] Deadly waste returned to US forces
[news mail 01 Jul 03 ] US troops 'shoot civilians'
[news mail 25 Jun 03] Troops show uranium sickness signs
[news mail 30 May 03] U.S. Colonel Admits 500 Tons of D.U. Were Used in Iraq
[news mail 28 May 03] Rebecca Solnit on hope in dark time
[news mail 06 May 03] Veterans claim Gulf syndrome victory
[news mail 20 Apr 03] Al-Tuwaitha turned into a Horrific Uranium-contamination Zone
[news mail 18 Apr 03] Free to commit crimes and do bad things
[news mail 15 Apr 03] Image-making, lies and the "liberation" of Iraq
[news mail 05 Apr 03] The stories of the soldiers
[news mail 04 Apr 03] UK Defence Secretary said 'Don't believe the Fisk's reports'
[news mail 03 Apr 03] Human Shields - Mission accomplished
[news mail 02 Apr 03] Children killed in US cluster bomb attack
[news mail 27 Mar03] Ritter : US WILL LOSE
[news mail 21 Mar 03] UK children protest the war!





[news mail 06 Dec 03 ]
The Peace Constitution


Dear friends,

Midori at the 'Children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing.

Two Japanese diplomats were killed in Iraq last weekend. You may have heard or read this news.

Though there is no information yet as to who killed them, I think it is highly likely that Iraqi resistance did it. (Note that it's my guess.)

If so, who is to blame? People who shot the diplomats? Or is it that the victims just got what they deserved?

Junichiro Koizumi, the Japanese prime minister, and his government say they are willing to play a part in this "war on terror" and to send "our troops," Japanese Self-Defense Force(SDF), to Iraq in order to support the "reconstruction."

I am, of course, a Japanese national. Sending troops to Iraq is, I believe, supporting this immoral invasion and occupation by the American and British governments.

It's not only me: according to a recent poll, the majority of Japanese people don't agree with the prime minister. There are many reasons for this, the biggest being that sending SDF is utterly against Japan's constitution.

Japan's constitution is sometimes called "peace constitution." You might want to see why it's called so. Take a look at the article 9:

CHAPTER II. RENUNCIATION OF WAR / Article 9.
Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes. In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized.

* To read the whole Japan's constitution in English, visit:
http://www.okakogi.go.jp/People/miwa/document/law/ConstitutionOfJapan.html

This constitution came into power in November 1946, less than fifteen months after the World War II ended, or I'd better say Japan was defeated.

As a Japanese national, I am very proud of this "peace constitution," especially of this article 9.

Sadly enough, some dispute has arisen about our constitution. Politicians are talking about how this constitution should be revised, not if it should be revised. Over these decades, the "interpretation" of the constitution has been distorted, and Japan keeps sending PKF troops to some areas like Cambodia.

What a shame. We have the most beautiful law in the world, don't we?

Japanese politicians say this constitution is "old, out-dated and almost useless." I don't agree.

I have a dream: peace constitution for more countries. The more countries "renounce war," the more peaceful the world will be. You may say I'm a dreamer, but this is what I want to see. And of cource, Japan should never throw it away. We have to keep it for ever to make the world a better place.

With love,

Midori





[news mail 02 Oct 03]
Lone Japanese Diplomat Standing for Truth

Here is a dispatch from Japanese opinion magazine became public recently, translated by Chihaya who is my dear friend, one of the members of the exhibition Australia tour and a member of the TUP / Translators United for Peace. It is open for free distribution.

---------------------------------------------
Lone Diplomat Standing for Truth
http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2003/10/70384.php

Japanese Ambassador to Lebanon was intimidated and fired because he kept sending messages to higher officials demanding to stop supporting the Invasion to Iraq that the United States and the United Kingdom initiated.

Yet Mr. Amaki, the former Ambassador has not been beaten. He rejected the alternative job offer in order to cut his relationship with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs completely, and is preparing to keep prosecuting the responsible because he had an information that the plan of Iraq Invasion was already there more than a year ago.

Here is what he had to say, when the invasion started. Mr. Amaki has approved me to forward my translation of his letter he wrote on 23rd of March, so please feel free to share it with your friends and families.

Chihaya
May Earth be Filled with Peace and Happiness!


------------------------------------
"And the war began"
by Naoto Amaki
March 23, 2003


http://www.meij.or.jp/countries/lebanon/amaki92.htm (in Japanese)

Naoto Amaki
Japanese Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to Lebanon
March 23, 2003

The twentieth of March, 2003 will be an unforgettable day as part of the history of diplomacy in the Middle East and in my life as a diplomat over 34 years.

The bombing of Baghdad during the second day of the invasion by the United States was shocking. They called it "Shock and Awe." They say it was the operation to weaken Iraqis' fighting spirit by the sound of explosions and emphasizing their destroying power. It's such a horrible deed to deny humanity. And we are about to see an unimaginable disaster being developed under the name of capturing Baghdad.

Facing the atrocity through TV screen without averting my eyes, I realized again that war is a concept that verifies failed diplomacy. Diplomacy must be optimized to avoid this situation no matter what.

During the two years of my assignment in this small country in the Middle East, I found that Lebanese people were fond of Japanese and our culture. They saw us as diligent and polite people who value tradition, and are fully aware how precious peace is from our devastating experience as a consequence of the nuclear bomb dropped on Hiroshima. And they thought that Japanese would understand the Arabs, and they wanted us to take initiative in pursuit of the peace in the Middle East. I was able to fulfill my task as the Ambassador with their positive and favorable wishes towards us.

But when the words of Prime Minister Koizumi supporting the United States' War on Iraq were introduced repeatedly through media, everybody I saw here that regardless of their position both government officials or civilians, said to me, "I was surprised and disappointed with Japanese attitude. I believed that you were different from Americans and would understand us Arabs. This must be some kind of mistake. I still want to believe that there is no way Japan choosing to support this." I received phone calls from Lebanese whom I never met. This didn't happen even once in the past two years.

However, they still are kind to me. They don't protest with anger in their faces, but tell me "It's a shame, it is a great shame" with such sad expression. My heart is torn, aches and grieves.

Just like picking up pieces of rubbles destroyed by missiles, I would like to pick up the pieces of the Middle East diplomacy one by one from the beginning within Lebanon. That is my fervent wish and why l keep sending you a letter from Lebanon.



>>page top


[news mail 26 Sep 03]
The Toxic Legacy of the Iraq War
Generational Casualties
By STAN GOFF

The Toxic Legacy of the Iraq War
Generational Casualties
By STAN GOFF
September 24, 2003
Counter punch

My grandson was born last December at Womack Army Medical Center, one of the finest medical facilties in the country now. The labor and delivery room was nicer than many hotel rooms. The care and attention was nonpareil. Military medical care -- now under idiotic pressure to privatize -- is proof that profit is often antithetical to the provision of quality services.

My grandson was born there because his father -- my son -- was entitled to this quality care as a member of the Army. My son is now languishing in a former palace along the Euphrates River, surrounded by millions of people who don't want him there, waiting for mail that takes four to five weeks to arrive, keeping an ear attuned for incoming mortars, and gazing at pictures of his son -- our grandson -- who will not know him when he returns.

My grandson is perfect, and I don't just say that because I have become a grandparent cliche -- which I have, with my office and home both converted into shrines full of baby photos. He is perfect in that he has all his assigned parts, they function in coordination with one another, and his growth and development are proceeding, as the medical folk say, normally. He was born with great lungs and the grip of a longshoreman, he never seems to get sick, and he seems very interested in all people, in all music, in squirrels, and in passing automobiles. He seems to go into a trance when a breeze blows on his face, and he chatters and blows raspberries when he is excited.

I am crazy in love with this child, spoil him shamelessly, have already dedicated a book to him, and I look forward to more grandchildren, having three more kids who are well into their reproductive years.

At a recent Congressional briefing organized by Congresswoman Maxine Waters, ten military family members, myself included, testified about our opposition to Bushfeld's War. Afterwards, during dinner together, one of the young military spouses told me that she and her husband, now stationed in Iraq, had made a decision not to have children. Since then, those if us involved with the Bring Them Home Now campaign are hearing this more and more from military couples. They are worried about depleted uranium.

My grandson is learning to walk, and he is immensely curious, which makes for a lot of vigilance and work. But he didn't require massive surgery to survive to his ninth month, nor does he require a battery of experts and specialists like he would if he were born without a thyroid gland, or if he required a drain inserted into his cranial vault, or if his digestive tract were disconnected.

This happens a lot more than it should to Iraqi children, and it may happen to American children born to parents now serving in Iraq. That's why many couples in the military are now deciding that they will not have children. Here is an excert from a letter on the Bring Them Home Now web site: "My husband and I have decided not to have children. We are afraid that something that we've been exposed to in Iraq may cause birth defects. This whole war has turned my life upside down and is even affecting my life years into the future."

For those who are not faint-hearted, you can visit this site <*> where there are some very disturbing images of "extreme birth defects" in Iraq, that are occurring at alarming rates, lest anyone think this is an irrational fear being expressed by these military couples.

<*> http://www.web-light.nl/VISIE/extremedeformities.html

I am a big fan of these kinds of images, because the sense of decorum of our so-called press that excludes "offensive" images is a form of complicity. War is offensive. If we are to understand war, we need to see the bodies. People who support it should have to see it. Likewise, if you want to understand the reality of what is going on in the bodies of the troops, you need to see these terribly deformed children. We need to broadcast images of dead people, maimed people, deformed children, including our own dead and maimed and deformed, and we need to do it often. Anything else is denial.

[To read more]
http://www.counterpunch.org/

[Stan Goff] is the author of "Hideous Dream: A Soldier's Memoir of the US Invasion of Haiti" (Soft Skull Press, 2000) and of the upcoming book "Full Spectrum Disorder" (Soft Skull Press, 2003). He is a member of the BRING THEM HOME NOW! coordinating committee, a retired Special Forces master sergeant, and the father of an active duty soldier. Email for BRING THEM HOME NOW! is bthn@mfso.org. Goff can be reached at: sherrynstan@igc.org


>>page top



[news mail 12 Aug 03]
Hiroshima / Nagasaki Peace Declarations



Dear friends,

Midori at the Children of the Gulf War photo exhibition UK tour writing from Japan again. There are transcriptions of the speech at the peace ceremonies of Hiroshima on 6th and Nagasaki on 9th of August given by the mayors of both cities. If you already read them, please read again and spread widely! If you don't yet read them, please read carefully and also spread widely!

And an e-mail from my Japanese friend who living in Australia is following . She reported her action on that Hiroshima day in Melbourne.

I introduce a picture book, it titled 'Hiroshima no Pika'. Pika is a ward of sound of a strong lightning in Japanese language, it means nuclear bomb, title of the book means 'Atomic-bomb on Hiroshima'. That is a great picture book for knowing of consequences of atomic bomb for every ages including children of course. This is a story of a little girl who lived in Hiroshima with her parents on that day, an atomic bomb it called 'Little Boy' fell down from the blue sky by US force at WW2.

Author is Toshi Maruki who was a Japanese fine-artist died several years ago. Her husband, Iri Maruki was also a great fine-artist. They painted some big pictures about the nuclear bomb and the people in Hiroshima.

'Hiroshima no Pika' have been translating to several language. You can read some information about T Maruki and see some pictures of the 'Hiroshima no Pika' at the below.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0688012973/qid=1055418711/sr=8 -1/ref=sr_8_1/103-7637854-4571831?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

With love and peace from Japan,

-------------------------------------------------
2003 HIROSHIMA PEACE DECLARATION
August 6, 2003
By Tadatoshi Akiba

--------------------------------------------------
This year again, summer's heat reminds us of the blazing hell fire that swept over this very spot fifty-eight years ago. The world without nuclear weapons and beyond war that our hibakusha have sought for so long appears to be slipping deeper into a thick cover of dark clouds that they fear at any minute could become mushroom clouds spilling black rain.

The nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the central international agreement guiding the elimination of nuclear weapons, is on the verge of collapse. The chief cause is U.S. nuclear policy that, by openly declaring the possibility of a pre-emptive nuclear first strike and calling for resumed research into mini-nukes and other so-called "useable nuclear weapons," appears to worship nuclear weapons as God.

However, nuclear weapons are not the only problem. Acting as if the United Nations Charter and the Japanese Constitution don't even exist, the world has suddenly veered sharply away from post-war toward pre-war mentality. As the U.S.-U.K.- led war on Iraq made clear, the assertion that war is peace is being trumpeted as truth. Conducted with disregard for the multitudes around the world demanding a peaceful solution through continued UN inspections, this war slaughtered innocent women, children, and the elderly. It destroyed the environment, most notably through radioactive contamination that will be with us for billions of years. And the weapons of mass destruction that served as the excuse for the war have yet to be found.

However, as President Lincoln once said, "You can't fool all the people all the time." Now is the time for us to focus once again on the truth that "Darkness can never be dispelled by darkness, only by light." The rule of power is darkness. The rule of law is light. In the darkness of retaliation, the proper path for human civilization is illumined by the spirit of reconciliation born of the hibakusha's determination that "no one else should ever suffer as we did."

Lifting up that light, the aging hibakusha are calling for U.S. President George Bush to visit Hiroshima. We all support that call and hereby demand that President Bush, Chairman Kim Jong Il of North Korea, and the leaders of all nuclear-weapon states come to Hiroshima and confront the reality of nuclear war. We must somehow convey to them that nuclear weapons are utterly evil, inhumane and illegal under international law. In the meanwhile, we expect that the facts about Hiroshima and Nagasaki will be shared throughout the world, and that the Hiroshima-Nagasaki Peace Study Course will be established in ever more colleges and universities.

To strengthen the NPT regime, the city of Hiroshima is calling on all members of the World Conference of Mayors for Peace to take emergency action to promote the abolition of nuclear weapons. Our goal is to gather a strong delegation of mayors representing cities throughout the world to participate in the NPT Review Conference that will take place in New York in 2005, the 60th year after the atomic bombing. In New York, we will lobby national delegates for the start of negotiations at the United Nations on a universal Nuclear Weapons Convention providing for the complete elimination of nuclear weapons.

At the same time, Hiroshima calls on politicians, religious professionals, academics, writers, journalists, teachers, artists, athletes and other leaders with influence. We must establish a climate that immediately confronts even casual comments that appear to approve of nuclear weapons or war. To prevent war and to abolish the absolute evil of nuclear weapons, we must pray, speak, and act to that effect in our daily lives.

The Japanese government, which publicly asserts its status as "the only A-bombed nation," must fulfill the responsibilities that accompany that status, both at home and abroad. Specifically, it must adopt as national precepts the three new non-nuclear principles - allow no production, allow no possession, and allow no use of nuclear weapons anywhere in the world - and work conscientiously toward an Asian nuclear-free zone. It must also provide full support to all hibakusha everywhere, including those exposed in "black rain areas" and those who live overseas.

On this 58th August 6, we offer our heartfelt condolences to the souls of all atomic bomb victims, and we renew our pledge to do everything in our power to abolish nuclear weapons and eliminate war altogether by the time we turn this world over to our children.

Tadatoshi Akiba
Mayor, The City of Hiroshima

(Printable versions are)
http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/03e/8_6/declaration/hdeclaration.html
(or)
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=17&ItemID=4013

-------------------------------------------------
2003 NAGASAKI PEACE DECLARATION
August 9, 2003
By Iccho Itoh

-------------------------------------------------
Today, the modern buildings and houses of Nagasaki's verdant cityscape make it difficult to imagine what happened here at the end of the Second World War on August 9 at 11:02 AM, fifty-eight years ago. An American aircraft dropped a single atomic bomb that was detonated at an altitude of about 500 meters over the district known as Matsuyama-machi. In an instant, the resulting heat rays, blast wind, and radiation descended upon Nagasaki and transformed the city into a hell on Earth. Some 74,000 people were killed, and 75,000 injured. Many of those who were spared from death were afflicted with incurable physical and mental wounds, and many continue today to suffer from the after-effects of the atomic bombing, and from health problems induced by the stress of their experience. We have ceaselessly called for the eradication of nuclear weapons and the establishment of world peace, so that such a tragedy is never repeated.

Nevertheless, in March of this year, the US and the UK launched a preemptive attack on Iraq, whom they accused of possessing weapons of mass destruction. In the ensuing war, waged in the absence of a United Nations resolution, the lives of many civilians were sacrificed in addition to those of soldiers. We deeply regret that this conflict could not be averted, despite our appeals for a peaceful resolution based on international cooperation, and a rising worldwide anti-war movement.

In January of last year, the United States government conducted a nuclear posture review, recommending the development of mini-nuclear weapons and the resumption of nuclear explosions for test purposes, and openly proposing the use of nuclear weapons under certain circumstances. At the same time, following nuclear tests by India and Pakistan, the disclosure by North Korea that it too possesses nuclear weapons has served to heighten the tension of international society. International agreements supporting nuclear disarmament, nuclear non-proliferation, and the prohibition of all nuclear weapons testing now appear to be on the verge of collapse.

Mother Theresa, when she visited Nagasaki, commented as she viewed a picture of a boy whose body had been burnt black in the atomic bombing, "The leaders of all the nuclear states should come to Nagasaki to see this photograph." We do indeed invite the leaders of the US and the other nuclear weapons states to visit the Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Museum, so that they may witness with their own eyes the tragic outcome of these instruments of destruction.

We also urge the government of Japan, the only country to have sustained a nuclear attack, to stand at the forefront of efforts to eliminate nuclear weapons. In response to concerns voiced both domestically and internationally over the possibility of Japan's remilitarization and nuclear armament, the government must uphold the principle of an exclusively defensive posture, and the Three Non-Nuclear Principles (stating that Japan will not possess, manufacture or allow nuclear weapons into the country) must be passed into law, thus demonstrating the sincerity of Japan's intentions. The Korean Peninsula Non-Nuclear Joint Statement must be realized in cooperation with other nations, and, based on the spirit of the Pyongyang Declaration, work must begin on the establishment of a Northeast Asia nuclear-weapon-free zone.

It is our hope that younger generations may continue to work for the advancement of science and technology in pursuit of human happiness. May they also consider what has been wrought upon humanity when these have been misused, and learn from the events of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. May they turn their eyes to the wider world around them, consider what must be done to bring about peace, and join hands in concerted action.

Here in Nagasaki, the hibakusha atomic bomb survivors, growing increasingly older, are continuing to earnestly retell their experiences of the atomic bombing, and large numbers of young people are actively engaged in peace promotion and volunteer activities. Nagasaki City will persevere in providing opportunities for learning and reflection, that the experiences of the atomic bombing may not become lost and forgotten. In November of this year, we will host for the second time the Nagasaki Global Citizens' Assembly for the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons, an international gathering of peace-supporting NGOs and individuals, held in advance of the 2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, calling to the peoples of the world for the abolition of nuclear weapons.

Today, on the 58th anniversary of the atomic bombing, as we pray for the repose of those who died and recall to mind their suffering, we the citizens of Nagasaki pledge our commitment to the realization of true peace in the world, free from nuclear weapons.

Iccho Itoh,
Mayor of Nagasaki

(Printable versions are)
http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/03e/8_9/declaration/ndeclaration.html
(or)
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=17&ItemID=4022

-------------------------------------------------
2002 HIROSHIMA PEACE DECLARATION
-------------------------------------------------

http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/02e/8_6/declaration/hdeclaration.html

-------------------------------------------------
2002 NAGASAKI PEACE DECLARATION
-------------------------------------------------

http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/02e/8_9/declaration/ndeclaration.html

-------------------------------------------------
August 6 - Hiroshima Day
By Chihaya

-------------------------------------------------
Hello Peace Makers,

On Wednesday, I went to the U.S. Consulate in Melbourne to join the Women For Peace to protest, commemorating the Hiroshima Day.

There were about 15 of us, relatively small, but our presence was strong. I read Charley and Nancy's letter ("A letter about a child in harm's way" www.mfso.org ), sang my songs - "Beyond the Boundary and Race" and "Requiem - though it was just a beginning," and showed some books to my "comrades" that I've got from Hiroshima.

People at the Consulate, obviously didn't like us, and called the police to get rid of us. But we managed to stay, convincing the police officers that we were such a peaceful bunch - Reta, the head of the group was very good at it.

I thought to myself that we wouldn't have been there then only if the U.S. Governments chose to face the facts, regretted what they'd done, and stopped doing the same thing to others such as using DU(depleted uranium) and creating further more "compact" nuclear weapons to KILL KILL KILL.

I was there for about a couple of hours (they were there from 10am to 4pm) and went on to buy some Japanese food in the city with my placard hanging from my neck at the front.

Many saw it, some nodded without saying a word.

One said in a shop, "Good sign! Very good!!" so I told him about the rally on Nagasaki Day, which my daughter and I were to join, and he said, "Saturday? I'll come!"

One guy working on a sidewalk, seemed interested, so I talked to him.

He asked me, if they didn't drop those a-bombs what would have happened i.e. they could not stop the war unless they did. So I told him that towards the end, Japanese were already exhausted and sick of war, so they were negotiating with Russians to cease fire. That was because Japanese could not accept the condition that the U.S. Government demanded, to get rid of our Emperor.

The U.S. Government didn't want Russians to take over Japan. And they had those two different kinds of a-bombs just invented, and wanted to see how powerful they could be.

That's the story.

That guy who went to South Africa as a soldier, seemed surprised. I believe he only knew what they told him which is that Japanese were ready to fight further more (probably true with some tops in the crazy military personnel) and the casualties on both sides would have amounted to huge, which nowadays, some says that then estimate was actually exaggerated.

And he asked me, "What about the war like the WWII? Can you leave someone like Hitler alone?"

Well, there could be times when you have to interfere, but the important thing is that we've got to detect when they are lying to us, and figure out the real reasons behind the scene.

Also, there is no doubt that the weapons that keep harming and killing for generations to come is the worst of all, and we should not allow anybody to use such weapons. He agreed with me on that and said, "Nobody is a winner in war."

Although it didn't look like that he would come to join our rally on Nagasaki Day, I certainly helped him see things in a different way, I hope.

Then I moved to Flinders Street Station, one of the main stations in Melbourne, and stood in the middle of the road near a tram (streetcar) depot, holding the sign to show to the pedestrians.

Many passed by with just a glance. But some were nodding, and one woman said to me,
"GOOD on you!!"(=Good job) as she was passing by.
Another young man, whispered "If there is love, there will be peace" and walked away.
So I shouted back saying, "Come to the rally!"

I thought about those who were killed in Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Afghanistan, Iraq and other places who could not even shout, "Don't kill me!!" before they killed them.

I feel that I've got to shout for them. And sure I will!

Love and Peace,
Chihaya


>>page top





[news mail 04 Aug 03 ]
Mystery illness kills soldier


Dear friends,

Midori at the 'Children of the Gulf War' UK tour writing.

The day after tomorrow, 6th of August is the memorial day of Hiroshima. 58 years ago, under the beautiful summer sky, Hiroshima had turned it into hell at one moment. And three days after, 9th of August, the second nuclear bomb dropped in Nagasaki.

Everything was burned down. Only the burnt fields were left. The death toll of these cities has been 140 thousand in Hiroshima and seventy thousand in Nagasaki during the four months period after the bombs were dropped that year.

People in Hiroshima and Nagasaki who escaped the bomb and death started to die in the peaceful after-war Japan. In the 58 years after the nuclear bombs related death has totaled more than 230 thousand in Hiroshima and 120 thousand in Nagasaki. The two bombs dropped in August 1945 killed 350 thousand people. And the number is still growing even now.

People who went to rescue a few days after the bombs are dropped also died. People who were not even conceived were also killed. Just because Uranium235 which was used in the bomb called "Little Boy" dropped in Hiroshima and Uranium 238 which was used in the bomb "Fat Man" have affected the genes.

All people in Iraq, both Iraqi and the soldiers or peace workers came from other countries are facing the risk of radiation of DU weapons.

---------------------------------------------------------------
Mystery illness kills Missouri soldier

Josh Neusche died Saturday; his family waits for answers.

By Eric Eckert News-Leader Staff
07/16/03 The Springfield News-Leader

Seventeen-year-old Jacob Neusche spent Tuesday morning packing up his big brother's belongings; books, a high school letterman's jacket and a Class A uniform. "That's what Josh will be buried in" the teenager said, referring to the uniform.

Missouri National Guard Spc. Josh Neusche, 20, died Saturday at the Homburg Hospital in Germany from a mysterious illness. A member of the 203rd Engineer Battalion, he is the only Missouri National Guardsman on the Department of Defense's casualty list.

Family and friends are awaiting the soldier's body, scheduled to arrive Thursday in the United States.

They are also waiting for autopsy results, and his parents, Mark and Cindy Neusche, are calling for an investigation.

"He's always been healthy," Mark Neusche said. "Hell, he's a cross-country runner. There's no reason for a boy of his health to deteriorate so quickly."

Cindy Neusche said her son collapsed July 2 while in Baghdad and was transported to Germany. Doctors there told the family they believed Josh suffered from pneumonia due to fluid that had collected on his lungs. But then his liver, kidneys and muscles started to break down, his mother said.

"They were doing some things there, trying to get his kidneys flushed out," she said through tears. "They told us his potassium levels came up so far and he needed to go on dialysis."

The Neusches traveled to Germany Friday to be with their son. When they arrived, they found him in a drug-induced coma. The grief-stricken couple weren't able to talk with their boy, but they believe he knew they were there.

"In our hearts, we felt he heard us," said Cindy Neusche. "You could tell by the machines he was on. His heart rate got faster when we talked to him."

Josh Neusche died the next day.

Doctors and family members are still befuddled by the strange illness. There's got to be an explanation, Mark Neusche said. He prays the hospital's autopsy will reveal the cause.

"I know the doctor over in Germany said he got into some type of toxin, " Mark Neusche said. "Several soldiers were in similar conditions while we were there."

So far there has been no hint of an official inquiry.

"That's not under investigation," said U.S. Army Spokesman, Lt. Col. Jeff Keane, from Virginia.

"To my knowledge, we've not been asked to do that (investigate)," added Whitney Frost, a spokeswoman for U.S. Rep. Ike Skelton.

Meanwhile, friends and family have been reminiscing about their loved one.

To read more:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4130.htm


---------------------------------------------------------------
Mysterious Diseases Haunt U.S. Troops In Iraq

NATO experts attribute the mysterious symptoms suffered by U.S. soldiers
to the use of depleted uranium

BAGHDAD, July 17 IslamOnline.net & News Agencies

Several mysterious diseases were reported among a number of American troops within the vicinity of Baghdad airport, a military source closely close to NATO unveiled.

U.S. soldiers deployed around Baghdad airport started showing symptoms of mysterious fever, itching, scars and dark brown spots on the skin, the source, who refused to be named, said in statements published Thursday, July 17, by the Saudi Al-Watan newspaper.

He asserted that three soldiers who suffered these symptoms did not respond to medical treatment in Iraqi hospitals and were flown to Washington for medication.

The military source reported a media blackout by U.S. officials to hide such information from the public.

The Americans claim the symptoms and the mysterious diseases were resulting from exposure to the scourging sun, which the U.S. troops are not used to, he added.

U.S. officials did not come up with an explanation for the symptoms, which NATO experts tend to believe result from direct exposure to powerful nuclear radiations of the sophisticated B-2 bombs used in the war on Iraq, particularly in striking Iraqi Republican Guards forces who deployed to defend the vicinity of Baghdad airport.

The military source stressed that the shrouds of secrecy imposed by American officials on the issue were prompted by fears of creating waves of panic and anger among the troops, particularly after announcements that American troops would remain in Iraq indefinitely.

To read more:
http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2003-07/17/article03.shtml


>>page top






[news mail 03 Jul 03]
Mr. Morizumi's Iraq report


Dear friends,

Midori at the 'children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing.

Takashi Morizumi who is a photographer of the 'Children of the Gulf War' was back to Japan from Iraq the end of last month. This was his 3rd visiting from the war starting on March. He had sent some reports and photos during his latest visiting. Following reports are some of them.

---------------------------------------------
Mr. Morizumi's Iraq report
[From Baghdad]
Received:19:51JST, 12/06/03

Yesterday I began a research on depleted uranium bombs and on contaminations at the pillaged nuclear facilities. As for the Iraqi tanks, none was left in the Baghdad city centre, having been cleared away by the American troops some two days ago. But in areas that met heavy aerial bombardments, the radiation meter indicated clearly abnormal levels.

The barrels containing yellow cakes - which Iraqi civilians had removed from the Al-Tuwaitha nuclear facilities - were retrieved by the Americans, purchased at three dollars a barrel. But the machine-like instruments used to mix yellow cakes were left abandoned in a residential area, with traces of the substance showing a radiation level one thousand times higher than the safety limit. Residents, however, had not been informed of the danger; none of them knew the identity of the substance. How could they, with no survey meter at their disposal?

Americans nor anybody else were dealing with the danger. I asked a passing policeman to clear the barrels away.

-------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Morizumi's Iraq report
[Depleted uranium bombs discovered in Mahamadhia, the suburbs of Baghdad]
Received:22:56JST, 14/06/03

In Baghdad, I found a number of tanks destroyed by depleted uranium bombs. All in residential districts. The residents were worried, but no information was forthcoming. In today' Iraq, no one informs no one. Civilians must do what they can to protect themselves. A sad state of affairs, for which Americans must assume the responsibility.

When I brought the survey meter to a crater created by depleted uranium bombs, the warning signal kept on sounding. Nearby children were playing. I told the residents to stay away, but they didn't understand the nature of the danger. You don't feel anything when you're being contaminated by radiation. The fact that you can't feel it makes the bombs even more insidious.

An Iraqi tank destroyed by depleted uranium bombs in a commercial district, some 35km southwest of Baghdad. It has been abandoned there for over two months. Residents feel a vague sense of danger, but are helpless when it comes to actually having it removed. There's no one to deal with this huge contaminated tank.

I've searching depleted uranium bombs everyday. The heat reaching fifty degrees centigrade makes me feel dizzy. A siesta is essential during the day to preserve energy. I become more and more aware of the extent to which depleted uranium bombs were used. Today I went to Bellet, 150km northeast of Baghdad. It was here that fights broke out three days ago that left forty American casualties. Recently the Iraqi resistance against the American army is on the raise. The civilians who chat with American soldiers by the day bring out their guns at night to attack them. The resistance against the occupying forces will continue until the day they leave.
(Translated by Jun Mori)

To read all and view photographs:
http://www.chimerafilms.co.uk/children6.html


>>page top


[news mail 02 Jul 03]
Deadly waste returned to US forces


Dear friends,

Midori at the 'children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing.

Following two articles came from the "Greenpeace International" homepage, the latest news about Tuwaitha, Iraq. I had sent you news of the contamination of the "yellowcake" at Tuwaitha two months ago. If you don't know about that, please read the back issue titled "Al-Tuwaitha turned into a Horrific Uranium-contamination Zone". The people who living in that area need emergency support. Please read and spread it widely!

----------------------------------------
Deadly waste returned to US forces
Tue 24 June 2003 IRAQ/Baghdad


They claimed they were after weapons of mass destruction, but then allowed nuclear material to be carried off by the barrel. They said errant nuclear waste poses no health threat to the people in Iraq, but then denied access to experts. We delivered a dose of reality to the occupying forces: villages surrounding the Tuwaitha nuclear complex, just south of Baghdad, are contaminated with deadly radiation. Clean up must begin now.

A convoy of vehicles bearing Greenpeace banners that read "Al Tuwaitha - nuclear disaster - Act now!" with a single activist walking at its head, carrying a white flag, returned a large uranium "yellow cake" mixing canister to the US military guards stationed at the heart of the nuclear plant. The canister - the size of a small car - contained significant quantities of radioactive "yellowcake" and had been dumped on a busy section of open ground near the Tuwaitha plant. Despite the military being aware of its presence, locals say it has been left open and unattended for more than 20 days.

"If this had happened in the UK, the US or any other country, the villages around Tuwaitha would be swarming with radiation experts and decontamination teams. It would have been branded a nuclear disaster site and the people given immediate medical check-ups. The people of Iraq deserve no less from the international community. That they are being ignored is a scandal that must be rectified without delay," said Mike Townsley of Greenpeace International.(cont...)

To read more:
http://www.greenpeace.org/international_en/news/details?item_id=285508&print=1

-------------------------------
Radioactive barrel swap
Sat 28 June 2003 IRAQ/Baghdad

For many local people, the need for water storage overrides the unseen threat of radioactivity. We took clean water containers into the communities around the Tuwaitha nuclear facility near Baghdad and encouraged people to swap them for their radioactive ones, contaminated with uranium "yellowcake".

Despite a US$3 a barrel offer from the US Army, many in the community have retained the contaminated containers. Of the 500 barrels looted from the nuclear site since the war, about 150 are still unaccounted for. A new barrel costs US$15.

The affected people are not organised criminals but the poorest of the poor, living in chronic poverty after years of neglect and abuse at the hands of Saddam's regime and a decade of crippling sanctions. We hope that by offering new barrels specifically designed for water storage that we can return the last of the contaminated barrels to the US military for safe-keeping inside the Tuwaitha site.

To read more:
http://www.greenpeace.org/news/details?item_id=288792

Greenpeace International homepage:
http://www.greenpeace.org/homepage/


>>page top


[news mail 01 Jul 03 ]
US troops 'shoot civilians'

Dear friends,

Midori at the 'children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing.

Have you already read the articles from the Evening Standard on 19th of June it titled "US troops 'shoot civilians'"? I received it at about 10 days ago from my friend living in the US. If you don't yet read it, please read the below. Was the war really over?


------------------------------------------
US troops 'shoot civilians'
By Bob Graham in Baghdad, Evening Standard, 19 June 2003

American soldiers in Iraq today make the astonishing admission that they regularly kill civilians.

In a series of disturbing interviews which throws light on the chaos gripping the country, GIs also confess to leaving wounded Iraqi fighters to die, and even to shooting injured enemy soldiers. They say they are frequently confronted by fighters dressed as civilians, including women.

Their response is often to shoot first and ask questions later, even when it means killing genuine civilians. Yesterday, US troops killed at least one man and injured three others during a demonstration in Baghdad by former Iraqi soldiers protesting at not being paid for two months. US troops first fired into the air and then into the crowd after the demonstrators began throwing stones and bricks.

In the worsening cycle of violence, American tactics like these are feeding the resentment of many Iraqis who object to the occupation of their country. US troops are facing a growing number of hitandrun guerrilla attacks and more than 40 soldiers have been killed since George Bush declared the war over seven weeks ago. (cont...)

The threat American soldiers feel was illustrated today when a coalition-run humanitarian aid office north of Baghdad was shelled, killing one Iraqi worker and wounded 12. The attack represents a tactical shift by the guerillas as they target fellow Iraqis deemed to be too close to the allies.

One of the soldiers interviewed by the Evening Standard, Specialist Anthony Castillo, of the 3/15th US Infantry, said: "When there were civilians there, we did the mission that had to be done. When they were there, they were at the wrong spot, so they were considered enemy."

The soldiers are furious that their commanders have reneged on promises to send them home as soon as the war was won and are now forcing them into the role of peacekeepers.

The interviews will make troubling reading for US and British politicians and senior military staff desperate to pacify the country and impose order before a transfer to a civilian government run by Iraqis.

To read more:
http://www.thisislondon.com/news/articles/5401680?source=Evening%20Standard

-------------------------------------------
[full interview]
'I just pulled the trigger'
By Bob Graham, Evening Standard, in Baghdad 19 June 2003

At first glance they appear to be the archetypal Band Of Brothers of Hollywood myth, brave and honest men united in common purpose.

But a closer look at these American GIs, sweltering in the heat of an unwelcoming Iraq, reveals the glazed eyes and limp expressions of those who have witnessed a war they do not understand and have begun to resent. By their own admission these American soldiers have killed civilians without hesitation, shot wounded fighters and left others to die in agony.

What they told me, in a series of extraordinary interviews, will make uncomfortable reading for US and British politicians and senior military staff desperate to prevent the liberation of Iraq turning into a quagmire of Vietnam proportions, where the behaviour of troops feeds the hatred of an occupied people.

Sergeant First Class John Meadows revealed the mindset that has led to hundreds of innocent Iraqi civilians being killed alongside fighters deliberately dressed in civilian clothes. "You can't distinguish between who's trying to kill you and who's not," he said. "Like, the only way to get through s*** like that was to concentrate on getting through it by killing as many people as you can, people you know are trying to kill you. Killing them first and getting home."

These GIs, from Bravo Company of the 3/15th US Infantry Division, are caught in an impossible situation. More than 40 of their number have been killed by hostile forces since 1 May - when President Bush declared major military operations were over - and the number of hit-and-run attacks is on the increase. They face a resentful civilian population and, hiding among it, a number of guerrilla fighters still loyal to the old regime. A lone Iraqi sniper nicknamed The Hunter is believed to have claimed his sixth American victim this week in a suburb of Baghdad.

The man, said to be a former member of the Republican Guard Special Forces, has developed a cult status among some Iraqis. One Baghdad resident, Assad al Amari, said: "He is fighting for Iraq on his own. There will be many more Americans killed because they cannot stop The Hunter. He will be given the protection of people who will let him use their homes for his shooting."

In this hostile atmosphere the men of Bravo Company are asked to maintain order, yet at the same time win hearts and minds. It is not a dilemma they feel able to resolve. They spoke to me - dressed in uniforms they have worn for the past six weeks - at their base in Fallujah. Here US troops killed 18 demonstrators at a pro-Saddam rally soon after the war and now face local fighters bent on revenge.

Their attitude to these dangers is summed up by Specialist (Corporal) Michael Richardson, 22. "There was no dilemma when it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just pulled the trigger. It was up close and personal the whole time, there wasn't a big distance. If they were there, they were enemy, whether in uniform or not. Some were, some weren't."

Specialist Anthony Castillo added: "When there were civilians there we did the mission that had to be done. When they were there, they were at the wrong spot, so they were considered enemy." In one major battle - at the southern end of Baghdad at the intersection of the main highways - the soldiers estimate about 70 per cent of the enemy's 400-or-so fighters were dressed as civilians.

Sgt Meadows explained: "The fight lasted for about eight hours and they just kept on coming all day from everywhere, from all sides. They were all in plain clothes.

"We had dropped fliers a couple of days prior saying to people to get out of the area if they didn't want to fight, so basically anyone who was there was a combatant. If they were dumb enough to stand in front of tanks or drive a car towards a tank, then they were there to fight. On that day it took away the dilemma of who to fire at, anyone who was there was a combatant."

Cpl Richardson added: "That day nothing went with the training. There were females fighting; there were some that, when they saw you f****** coming, they'd just drop their s*** and try to give up; and some guys were shot and they'd play dead, and when you'd go by they'd reach for their weapons. That day it was just f****** everything. When we face women or injured that try to grab their weapons, we just finish them off. You've gotta, no choice."(cont..)


To read more:
http://www.thisislondon.com/news/articles/5402104


>>page top



[news mail 25 Jun 03]
Troops show uranium sickness signs


Dear friends,

Dr.Douglas Rokke who is a former US Army nuclear health physicist, is in Australia for speech tour invited by the group who has organised the 'Children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition in Australia.

Dr Rokke said Iraqi women and children and American and Iraqi military personnel had reported respiratory illnesses and rashes after the recent conflict, and he had also been told of Australian servicemen and women with similar symptoms.

Here is news from the ' Sydney Morning Herald' on 23rd of June 2003. The interview with Dr Douglas Rokke at the Al Jazeera is following after that. It is quite long, but it has value to read I believe.

----------------------------------------------------------
1) Troops show uranium sickness signs, claims expert
June 23 2003 Sydney Morning Herald

2) Depleted uranium will affect Iraq for generations to come
April 15 2003 Al Jazeera
-----------------------------------------------------------

1) Troops show uranium sickness signs, claims expert
AAP June 23 2003 Sydney Morning Herald

Australian servicemen and women who served in the recent Iraq war were reporting symptoms of uranium sickness, a United States nuclear weapons expert said today.

Dr Douglas Rokke is a former US Army nuclear health physicist and was formerly the Pentagon's expert on the health effects of depleted uranium ammunition.

Speaking in Melbourne today, Dr Rokke said Iraqi women and children and American and Iraqi military personnel had reported respiratory illnesses and rashes after the recent conflict, and he had also been told of Australian servicemen and women with similar symptoms.

"That's the reports I received from the US Army medical department. That's something that needs to be verified and looked into," he said.

"When American soldiers are sick and the Iraqis are sick there's nothing that says an Australian soldier is going to be isolated when he goes through those areas and he is not going to become ill. (cont...)

To read more:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/06/23/1056220529069.html

---------------------------------------------
2) Depleted uranium will affect Iraq for generations to come
April 15 2003 Al Jazeera


The Presenter (Ahmed Mansour): Despite research by a large number of scientists and experts on the enormous damage inflicted by depleted uranium ... and the use by the US in the Gulf War in 1991 , and wars in the Balkans and Afghanistan in 1994 ,1995 , 1999 and 2000 ... The US use of depleted uranium is not confined to the total destruction of targets but extends to the destruction of the environment and human life in general in the affected regions. Such areas will be unfit for habitation for millions of years.

Our guest is professor Major Doug Rocke, former chief of Depleted Uranium Project at the Pentagon.

Born in Illinois 1949 , professor Doug Rocke joined the US Air Force in 1967 , took part in the Vietnam War from 1969 to 1971 as a B52 pilot. He obtained his PhD in nuclear physics. He worked until 1996 as a field doctor and specialist in nuclear physics in the US Army. He took part in the 1991 Gulf War, tasked with depleted uranium clean up in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

From March to June 1991 , Prof Rocke compiled contaminated equipment from the battlefield and shipped part of it back to the US and supervised the burial of more equipment in Saudi Arabian deserts. He was appointed head of the Depleted Uranium Project in the Pentagon between 1 August 1994 and November 1995 . He also worked as a professor of nuclear physics at Jackson University - Alabama until 2000 .

Prof Rocke says he suffered the effects of depleted uranium from the first week of the Gulf War in 1991 but did not realise it until March 1995. Tests showed that he had 5000 times the normal level of radiation in his body, enough he says sarcastically, to light up a small village. He is also suffering from problems with breathing, immune system and one eye. He has had 15 surgical operations to his liver as a result of his infection by this uranium syndrome.

Q: At this very critical time, a lot of people are trying to understand and know more about the weapons containing depleted uranium which the United States plans to use... Despite all the studies and research that came up during the last period and confirmed the risks of using the depleted uranium, officials at the Pentagon announced that they are going to use depleted uranium bombs in Iraq again. What is your understanding of this announcement?

Professor Rocke: The announcement is very simple. Uranium munitions kill and destroy everything that they contact. Going back to the (1991) Gulf War and even before, the Pentagon had decided to use weapons that are absolutely efficient in combat. At the completion of the 1991 Gulf War when I was specifically assigned to clean up the uranium mess I received a memorandum, this is a Los Alamos memorandum written by a colonel at Los Alamos national laboratories in New Mexico. In that memorandum, he said "Even though we know there are health and environmental effects, you should make sure that we can always use uranium munitions in combat because they are so effective. And therefore lie about the health and environmental effects of the use of uranium munitions in combat."

The Presenter: Being the former chief of the depleted uranium project in the Pentagon, what are the risks of using depleted uranium on life and human beings in general?

Professor Rocke: The first thing that we have to understand is that each individual uranium round fired by an Abrams tank is ten pounds of solid uranium contaminated with plutonium, neptunium and americium. On impact, you have a fine uranium outside dust that is generated. This represents about one half of the original mass. So if you have 4500 grams, you have about 2300 grams or 2200 grams that turn into a dust on the outside, they can be inhaled .. and then get into the body. When this happens, you have all kinds of serious problems both metal poisoning and radiological effects on the body.

The Presenter: Being one of the victims of depleted uranium, can you describe the symptoms you felt when you were infected?

Professor Rocke: The most significant effect that we noticed was respiratory problems. And the respiratory problems acted like you had a really bad case of bronchitis. Your respiratory system was affected, you couldn't breathe as well and you started noticing all kinds of serious apparatus effects with your breathing system. The other health effect we saw immediately in ourselves and everybody else was the terrible rash. And the rash that we suspect and which we still have to this day is from the heavy metal poisoning that occurs just as if you would have eaten a litre of any other heavy toxic metal.

The Presenter: Dr. Rocke, What are the most important symptoms of inhaling depleted uranium?

Professor Rocke: The biggest problem that we had, in addition to the respiratory problems, is cancer which developed in members of our team within eight to nine months. Within two years, additional cancers developed and people started to die. Individuals that we had confirmed had embedded uranium shrapnel deliberately locked in their bodies by the United States Department of Defence did develop tumours in and around that embedded shrapnel. Published research verifies that uranium shrapnel or uranium embedded in the tissue will cause cancer. That we see in any place that uranium has been used, manufactured and processed .... in various areas of the United States.

The Presenter: But Michael Kilpatrick, who was responsible for providing medical care to the veterans at the Pentagon, said in a press conference that a study covering 90 infected veterans from the 1991 Gulf War proved that they were not suffering from any disease, whether it be cancer or otherwise. What do you say about this?

Professor Rocke: Dr. Kilpatrick lied to the world. It is very simple. First he stated that 90 individuals were affected ..... I had well over 100 individuals who were affected. I had another 250 individuals who were absolutely exposed while we were cleaning it up.......

The Presenter: Why did your colleagues in the Pentagon lie and for the benefit of whom?

Professor Rocke: The reason that they lie is to avoid any liability for the deliberate use of uranium munitions not only in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, throughout the Balkans and throughout all the sites in the United States. Again the purpose of the war is to kill and to destroy. Uranium munitions are absolutely destructive. (cont...)

To read more:
http://english.aljazeera.net/topics/article.asp?cu_no=1&item_no=2565&version=1&template_id=273&parent_id=258

>>page top





[news mail 30.05.03]
U.S. Colonel Admits 500 Tons of D.U. Were Used in Iraq


Dear friends,

Midori at the 'Children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing.

Following article came from Scoop.co.nz dated on 5th of May. Jay Shaft from the 'Coalition For Free Thought In Media' interviewed with an anonymous U.S. Special Operations Command Colonel. The U.S. Colonel said ' I am aware of at least 500 tons of D.U. munitions that were used by combined coalition forces'. 500 tons of D.U.!! are much more than the last time. Officially said the D.U. munitions were used 230 tons during the last Gulf War 1991.
Thank you.

----------------------------------------
1) U.S. Colonel Admits 500 Tons of D.U. Were Used in Iraq
By Jay Shaft - Coalition For Free Thought In Media - 5 May 2003 Scoop.co.nz

In three separate interviews a U.S. Special Operations Command Colonel admitted that the U.S. and Great Britain fired 500 tons of D.U. munitions into Iraq.

He has also informed me that the G.B.U.-28 BLU 113 Penetrator Bunker Buster 5000 pound bomb contains D.U. in the warhead. Until now, as far as I know, the materials used to make the warhead of the G.B.U-28 have remained shrouded in mystery.

He also admitted that privately the Pentagon has acknowledged the health hazards of D.U. for years.

He asked to remain unnamed for obviously apparent safety reasons, and so that he may remain a valuable source of information. (I will admit that I will jealously guard his identity to keep him as a source.)

I have verified his identity and that his information is mostly accurate.
Some things I could not verify due to top secret classifications of certain weapons.
The following is a transcript of questions I asked him. I will refer to him as U.S.C. from here on.

J.S.: I understand you are a Colonel in the U.S. military, is that right?

U.S.C.: You are correct; I work for the U.S. Special Operations Command attached to Central Command. My job is to plot coordinates for targets and decide what is the best way to destroy the target. I have a large network of analysts at my disposal to analyze each target and figure out what weapons would best destroy it.

J.S.: Do you know how much D.U. was just used in Iraq, and what types of munitions were used?

U.S.C.: Yes I am aware of at least 500 tons of D.U. munitions that were used by combined coalition forces. I also know that many cities were heavily bombarded with D.U. munitions.

J.S.: 500 tons? Are you absolutely sure?

U.S.C.: Oh, most sure on that matter. I know it was a little over 500 tons, but you can round off your figures to the nearest hundred tons (chuckles).

J.S.: What about the cities? Did you deliberately use D.U. on them?

U.S.C.: Let's just say that we didn't do anything to avoid using D.U. in cities or heavily populated areas. I know that I selected some D.U. bunker busters because of the fact that they have a high penetration factor. I used D.U. weapons exclusively on some targets so as to ensure maximum damage on those targets. You don't want to just halfway destroy some targets, you want maximum damage.

J.S.: Hold on here, I didn't know that the Bunker Busters were D.U. How do you know that? I have to make sure this is for real.

U.S.C.: Well the specs on the B.B.s are top secret, so good luck on verifying it. To answer your question I will ask you one. How do you think they can penetrate a steel hardened bunker with a bomb unit? There has to be D.U. in the warhead or else you wouldn't get the penetration of the target that is buried underground.

J.S.: Oh I see your point. Well can you tell me which of the B.B.s have D.U. warheads?

U.S.C.: Well.......... (long pause) I think I will tell you about one and leave it at that. The G.B.U.-28(guided bomb unit) BLU 113B 5000 pounder is capable of being fitted with a D.U. warhead and dropped. It is not solely a D.U. warhead; they still use them with conventional non-D.U. warheads. If you were watching T.V. and you saw any bombs hit there was an easy way to tell if it was D.U. If you saw all those little secondary white fires burning in the air in the blast: that was D.U. burning off. D.U. burns with a whitish orange flame, almost looks like a firework shell burning.

J.S.: Any other B.B.'s using D.U. warheads?

U.S.C.: I don't think I'll answer that, I've already said too much. Next question!

J.S.: Back to the 500 tons of D.U., did the D.O.D. / Pentagon deliberately target civilian areas? And if they did, why?

U.S.C.: I answered that already, but I will tell you that there were a lot of Iraqi armored vehicles in and around most major cities. Our own tanks and vehicles use D.U. penetrator rounds to destroy those enemy vehicles. We are aware that over 100 tons of D.U. munitions were used in and around Baghdad, but a lot more fighting went on around the Northern cities and Basra. We knocked out over 20,000 different types of vehicles in Iraq, and even shelled buildings in downtown Baghdad with D.U.

J.S.: The Pentagon knew this was happening? Did they try to stop it? You know, because of the health risks of D.U. and the fact that we were supposed to be liberating Iraq?

U.S.C.: They wanted complete destruction of any military vehicle in Iraq. That was why you saw our vehicles shooting even the disabled and already shelled vehicles. I have seen pictures of many vehicles with over 20 holes in them. The objective was to make sure that there is no way that any fighting force could ever use those vehicles in any way. We wanted to decimate the Iraqi army and make sure they were never able to fight again. I think we achieved that objective quite well, more so than we had hoped in such a short amount of time. This took an enormous amount of ammunition, mostly D.U. tipped 25mm, 30mm, and 125mm penetrator rounds.

J.S.: What about the health risks that are associated with D.U.? Or do you deny there are any?

U.S.C.: You are determined to get me to make a statement about the health risks aren't you?

J.S.: If you will, I want to see what the behind the scenes view of D.U. is in the Pentagon.

U.S.C.: Well**** (long pause, followed by heavy profanity). Okay, I'll give you some dirt if that's what you're looking for. The Pentagon knows there are huge health risks associated with D.U. They know from years of monitoring our own test ranges and manufacturing facilities. There were parts of Iraq designated as high contamination areas before we ever placed any troops on the ground. The areas around Basra, Jalibah, Talil, most of the southern desert, and various other hot spots were all identified as contaminated before the war. Some of the areas in the southern desert region along the Kuwaiti border are especially radioactive on scans and tests. One of our test ranges in Saudi Arabia shows over 1000 times the normal background level for radiation. We have test ranges in the U.S. that are extremely contaminated, hell they have been since the 80s and nothing is ever said publicly. Don't ask don't tell is not only applied to gays, it is applied to this matter very heavily. I know at one time the theory was developed that any soldier exposed to D.U. shells should have to wear full MOP gear (the chemical protective suit). But they realized that just wouldn't be practical and it was never openly discussed again.

J.S.: So the stories that they know D.U. is harmful are true?

U.S.C.: Yes, there is no doubt that most high level commanders who were around during the 80s know about it.

To read more:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0305/S00050.htm

- Jay Shaft, Editor: Coalition For Free Thought In Media
freethoughtinmedia@yahoo.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/coalitionforfreethoughtinmedia

----------------------------------------
2) U.S. Colonel/ I wrote the article, enough slander!
BY Jay Shaft / editor CFTM Fri May 9, 2003


Now, maybe we can discuss the article as it was actaully published. I am the author of this article and did the interview with the U.S. Colonel. I have been bombarded with hate mail ever since.

Since I did the interview I have talked to a few other high level officers who also confirmed that D.U. is used in some B.B. warheads. I took a great risk to print this article and am suffering greatly for it. I did not realize the shitstorm this would start when I did the interview.

To be honest I wasn't conducting an interview about D.U. I was doing an interview about civilian casualties and the D.U. topic just came up after the first interview. It took me over an hour to conduct the last interview, and I was not going to use it. I was convinced to print it by a lot of journalists who did not have the courage to use it themselves.

To read more:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/du-watch/message/1854



>>page top






[news mail 28.05.03]
Rebecca Solnit on hope in dark times


Dear friends,

Midori at the 'Children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing.

Following articles came from Tom Dispach.com it titled 'Rebecca Solnit on hope in dark times' dated on 19th of May. It is quite long. I am very pleased if you enjoy the time to reading it.

Solnit said; 'Imagine the world as a lifeboat: the corporations and the current administration are smashing holes in it as fast (or faster) than the rest of us can bail or patch the leaks. But it's important to take account of the bailers as well as the smashers and to write epics in the present tense rather than elegies in the past tense. That's part of what floats this boat. And if it sinks, we all sink, so why not bail? Why not row?'

Thank you,


------------------------------ ---------------------------
Tomgram: Rebecca Solnit on hope in dark times
by Tom Engelhardt 19 May 2003 Tom Dispach.com

You know how, out of the blue, someone can walk into your life? Sometimes, for a book editor, a manuscript walks in the same way. Sometimes, for a reader, a voice drifts in.

It happened to me recently, and it was the voice of Rebecca Solnit, arriving enfolded in an essay about hope. Hope and consequences, you might say. It seemed to have everything in it I've been wanting to say (but, for whatever reason, couldn't) - or rather everything I've been feeling all of us needed to hear and hadn't.

"Activism", Solnit writes, "is not a journey to the corner store; it is a plunge into the dark." Exactly. And history, she adds, "is like weather, not like checkers. A game of checkers ends. The weather never does." At the end of a game, she might have added, it's so simple. You tote up the score, sort out the winners and losers, close up the board, and go on to something else. At a pause in history, as at present, if you tote up the score, close up the board, and go home, you're making a disastrous mistake.

A lot of the antiwar movement has done that in the wake of our second Iraq war. And I don't blame them. All those people marching. All that opposition. And still a war _ and look at the opinion polls now! But what's so beautiful about Solnit's piece, the gorgeous writing aside, is that she wants us to stop adding up the score in that game-like way. She wants us to acknowledge the darkness of our moment and our world, but also realize that the score isn't in, that it can't be known. Not ever. Not really. And then she wants us to make a wager, to take that leap into the dark, and bet on hope. She wants that because we simply can't know the consequences of our acts, a point she makes with particular grace.

The pleasure of having a weblog is that _ thanks, in this case, to the kindness of an author and a magazine _ I can share with you the experience of that unexpected stranger entering the room. Solnit, an activist (environmental and antinuclear) as well as a writer, is the author most recently of River of Shadows: Eadweard Muybridge and the Technological Wild West. But as for myself, I'm now reading an older book of hers, a beauty called Savage Dreams: A Journey into the Landscape Wars of the American West about, among other things, our dress rehearsals for Armageddon, those atomic tests our government carried out above and then under the Nevada desert from the 1950s into the 1990s (tests the Bush administration wants to start up again).

Solnit is also a columnist for Orion, a twenty-one year old environmental magazine that describes its task as exploring "an emerging alternative worldview. Informed by a growing ecological awareness and the need for cultural change, it is a forum for thoughtful and creative ideas and practical examples of how we might live justly, wisely, and artfully on Earth." Orion, which has already posted "Acts of Hope" at its site, and Solnit have together given me permission to publish it as well. It's important. Please do read it and share it widely. Tom

---------------------------------------------
Acts of Hope - Challenging Empire on the World Stage
by Rebecca Solnit

"What We Hope For"

On January 18, 1915, six months into the first world war, the first terrible war in the modern sense -- slaughter by the hundreds of thousands, poison gas, men living and dying in the open graves of trench warfare, tanks, barbed wire, machine guns, airplanes -- Virginia Woolf wrote in her journal, "The future is dark, which is on the whole, the best thing the future can be, I think." Dark, she seems to say, as in inscrutable, not as in terrible. We often mistake the one for the other. People imagine the end of the world is nigh because the future is unimaginable. Who twenty years ago would have pictured a world without the USSR and with the Internet? We talk about "what we hope for" in terms of what we hope will come to pass but we could think of it another way, as why we hope. We hope on principle, we hope tactically and strategically, we hope because the future is dark, we hope because it's a more powerful and more joyful way to live. Despair presumes it knows what will happen next. But who, two decades ago, would have imagined that the Canadian government would give a huge swathe of the north back to its indigenous people, or that the imprisoned Nelson Mandela would become president of a free South Africa?

Twenty-one years ago this June, a million people gathered in Central Park to demand a nuclear freeze. They didn't get it. The movement was full of people who believed they'd realize their goal in a few years and then go home. Many went home disappointed or burned out. But in less than a decade, major nuclear arms reductions were negotiated, helped along by European antinuclear movements and the impetus they gave Gorbachev. Since then, the issue has fallen off the map and we have lost much of what was gained. The US never ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, and the Bush administration is planning to resume the full-fledged nuclear testing halted in 1991, to resume manufacture, to expand the arsenal, and perhaps even to use it in once-proscribed ways.

It's always too soon to go home. And it's always too soon to calculate effect. I once read an anecdote by someone in Women Strike for Peace, the first great antinuclear movement in the United States, the one that did contribute to a major victory: the 1963 end of aboveground nuclear testing with its radioactive fallout that was showing up in mother's milk and baby teeth.

She told of how foolish and futile she felt standing in the rain one morning protesting at the Kennedy White House. Years later she heard Dr. Benjamin Spock -- one of the most high-profile activists on the issue then -- say that the turning point for him was seeing a small group of women standing in the rain, protesting at the White House. If they were so passionately committed, he thought, he should give the issue more consideration himself.

"Unending Change"

A lot of activists expect that for every action there is an equal and opposite and punctual reaction, and regard the lack of one as failure. After all, activism is often a reaction: Bush decides to invade Iraq, we create a global peace movement in which 10 to 30 million people march on seven continents on the same weekend. But history is shaped by the groundswells and common dreams that single acts and moments only represent. It's a landscape more complicated than commensurate cause and effect. Politics is a surface in which transformation comes about as much because of pervasive changes in the depths of the collective imagination as because of visible acts, though both are necessary. And though huge causes sometimes have little effect, tiny ones occasionally have huge consequences.

Some years ago, scientists attempted to create a long-range weather forecasting program, assuming that the same initial conditions would generate the same weather down the road. It turned out that the minutest variations, even the undetectable things, things they could perhaps not yet even imagine as data, could cause entirely different weather to emerge from almost identical initial conditions. This was famously summed up as the saying about the flap of a butterfly's wings on one continent that can change the weather on another.

History is like weather, not like checkers. A game of checkers ends. The weather never does. That's why you can't save anything. Saving is the wrong word. Jesus saves and so do banks: they set things aside from the flux of earthly change. We never did save the whales, though we might've prevented them from becoming extinct. We will have to continue to prevent that as long as they continue not to be extinct. Saving suggests a laying up where neither moth nor dust doth corrupt, and this model of salvation is perhaps why Americans are so good at crisis response and then going home to let another crisis brew. Problems seldom go home. Most nations agree to a ban on hunting endangered species of whale, but their oceans are compromised in other ways. DDT is banned in the US, but exported to the third world, and Monsanto moves on to the next atrocity.

The world gets better. It also gets worse. The time it will take you to address this is exactly equal to your lifetime, and if you're lucky you don't know how long that is. The future is dark. Like night. There are probabilities and likelihoods, but there are no guarantees.

As Adam Hochschild points out, from the time the English Quakers first took on the issue of slavery, three quarters of a century passed before it was abolished it in Europe and America. Few if any working on the issue at the beginning lived to see its conclusion, when what had once seemed impossible suddenly began to look, in retrospect, inevitable. And as the law of unintended consequences might lead you to expect, the abolition movement also sparked the first widespread women's rights movement, which took about the same amount of time to secure the right to vote for American women, has achieved far more in the subsequent 83 years, and is by no means done. Activism is not a journey to the corner store; it is a plunge into the dark.

Writers understand that action is seldom direct. You write your books. You scatter your seeds. Rats might eat them, or they might just rot. In California, some seeds lie dormant for decades because they only germinate after fire. Sharon Salzberg, in her book Faith, recounts how she put together a book of teachings by the Buddhist monk U Pandita and consigned the project to the "minor-good-deed category." Long afterward, she found out that when Burmese democracy movement's leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, was kept isolated under house arrest by that country's dictators, the book and its instructions in meditation "became her main source of spiritual support during those intensely difficult years." Emily Dickinson, Walt Whitman, Walter Benjamin and Arthur Rimbaud, like Henry David Thoreau, achieved their greatest impact long after their deaths, long after weeds had grown over the graves of the bestsellers of their times. Gandhi's Thoreau-influenced nonviolence was as important in the American South as it was in India, and what transpired with Martin Luther King's sophisticated version of it has influenced civil disobedience movements around the world. Decades after their assassinations they are still with us.

At the port of Oakland, California, on April 7, several hundred peace activists came out at dawn at dawn to picket the gates of a company shipping arms to Iraq. The longshoreman's union had vowed not to cross our picket. The police arrived in riot gear and, unprovoked and unthreatened, began shooting wooden bullets and beanbags of shot at the activists. Three members of the media, nine longshoremen, and fifty activists were injured. I saw the bloody welts the size of half grapefruits on the backs of some of the young men--they had been shot in the back -- and a swelling the size of an egg on the jaw of a delicate yoga instructor. Told that way, violence won. But the violence inspired the union dock workers to form closer alliances with antiwar activists and underscored the connections between local and global issues. On May 12 we picketed again, with no violence. This time, the longshoremen acted in solidarity with the picketers and -- for the first time in anyone's memory -- the shipping companies cancelled the work shift rather than face the protesters. Told that way, the story continues to unfold, and we have grown stronger. And there's a third way to tell it. The picket stalled a lot of semi trucks. Some of the drivers were annoyed. Some sincerely believed that the war was a humanitarian effort.

Some of them -- notably a group of South Asian drivers standing around in the morning sun looking radiant -- thought we were great. After the picket was broken up, one immigrant driver honked in support and pulled over to ask for a peace sign for his rig. I stepped forward to pierce holes into it so he could bungee-cord it to the chrome grille. We talked briefly, shook hands, and he stepped up into the cab. He was turned back at the gates --they weren't accepting deliveries from antiwar truckers. When I saw him next he was sitting on a curb all alone behind police lines, looking cheerful and fearless. Who knows what will ultimately come of the spontaneous courage of this man with a job on the line?

"Victories of the New Peace Movement"

It was a setup for disappointment to expect that there would be an acknowledged cause and effect relationship between the antiwar actions and the Bush administration. On the other hand...

* We will likely never know, but it seems that the Bush administration decided against the "Shock and Awe" saturation bombing of Baghdad because we made it clear that the cost in world opinion and civil unrest would be too high. We millions may have saved a few thousand or a few hundred thousand lives.

* The global peace movement was grossly underreported on February 15th. A million people marching in Barcelona was nice, but I also heard about the thousands in Chapel Hill, NC, the hundred and fifty people holding a peace vigil in the small town of Las Vegas, NM, the antiwar passion of people in even smaller villages from Bolivia to Thailand.

* Activists are often portrayed as an unrepresentative, marginal rabble, but something shifted in the media last fall. Since then, antiwar activists have mostly been represented as a diverse, legitimate, and representative body, a watershed victory for our representation and our long-term prospects.

* Many people who had never spoken out, never marched in the street, never joined groups, written to politicians, or donated to campaigns, did so; countless people became political as never before. That is, if nothing else, a vast aquifer of passion now stored up to feed the river of change. New networks and communities and websites and listserves and jail solidarity groups and coalitions arose.

* In the name of the so-called war on terror, which seems to inculcate terror at home and enact it abroad, we have been encouraged to fear our neighbors, each other, strangers, (particularly middle-eastern, Arab, and Moslem people), to spy on them, to lock ourselves up, to privatize ourselves. By living out our hope and resistance in public together with strangers of all kinds, we overcame this catechism of fear, we trusted each other; we forged a community that bridged all differences among the peace loving as we demonstrated our commitment to the people of Iraq.

* We achieved a global movement without leaders. There were many brilliant spokespeople, theorists and organizers, but when your fate rests on your leader, you are only as strong, as incorruptible, and as creative as he -- or, occasionally, she -- is. What could be more democratic than millions of people who, via the grapevine, the Internet, and various groups from churches to unions to direct-action affinity groups, can organize themselves? Of course leaderless actions and movements have been organized for the past couple of decades, but never on such a grand scale. The African writer Laurens Van Der Post once said that no great new leaders were emerging because it was time for us to cease to be followers. Perhaps we have.

* We succeeded in doing what the anti-Vietnam War movement infamously failed to do: to refuse the dichotomies. We were able to oppose a war on Iraq without endorsing Saddam Hussein. We were able to oppose a war with compassion for the troops who fought it. Most of us did not fall into the traps that our foreign policy so often does and that earlier generations of radicals did: the ones in which our enemy's enemy is our friend, in which the opponent of an evil must be good, in which a nation and its figurehead, a general and his troops, become indistinguishable. We were not against the US and for Iraq; we were against the war, and many of us were against all war, all weapons of mass destruction -- even ours -- and all violence, everywhere. We are not just an antiwar movement. We are a peace movement.

* Questions the peace and anti-globalization movements have raised are now mainstream, though no mainstream source will say why, or perhaps even knows why. Activists targeted Bechtel, Halliburton, Chevron and Lockheed Martin, among others, as war profiteers with ties to the Bush administration. The actions worked not by shutting the places down in any significant way but by making their operations a public question. Direct action seldom works directly, but now the media scrutinizes those corporations as never before. Representative Henry Waxman publicly questioned Halliburton's ties to terrorist states the other day, and the media is closely questioning the administration's closed-door decision to award Halliburton, the company vice-president Cheney headed until he took office, a $7 billion contract to administer Iraqi oil. These are breakthroughs.

To read more:
http://www.nationinstitute.org/tomdispatch/index.mhtml?emx=x&pid=677

------------------------------
This article first appeared on OrionOnline.org
To see Orion magazine's illustrated version of the piece click below.
http://www.oriononline.org/pages/oo/sidebars/Patriotism/index_Solnit.html
Or if you would simply like to sample Orion's website, go to www.oriononline.org.
------------------------------

>>page top





[news mail 06 May 03]
Veterans claim Gulf syndrome victory


Dear friends,

Midori at the 'Children of the Gulf War' photo exhibition UK tour writing. I was back home from Japan at about 10 days ago. The next exhibition will be setting up at the Goldsmith Collage from 19th of May. I will send you further information soon.

I have found the article below about the Gulf War Syndrome today. It said 'the Ministry of Defence announced it would not appeal against a ruling by the war pensions tribunal accepting a link between the condition and vaccinations given to the armed forces.' on that article. I believe without any question that is very good news for the veterans who are suffering from the syndrome.

But then I have some questions, is the cause of the syndrome only vaccinations? Are they suffering from the DU weapons as well? Do the government want hiding the consequence of the DU weapon it used last March on the people of Iraq again? What do you think about that?

Please read below.

-----------------------------------------------------
Veterans claim Gulf syndrome victory
MoD will not challenge ruling that links illness to vaccinations
By Jamie Wilson
Tuesday May 6, 2003 The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,950107,00.html

Gulf war syndrome campaigners were yesterday claiming victory after the Ministry of Defence announced it would not appeal against a ruling by the war pensions tribunal accepting a link between the condition and vaccinations given to the armed forces.

Alex Izett, 33, a former lance corporal who developed brittle bone disease after the 1991 conflict despite never going to the Gulf, said it was a "watershed" moment in the battle to have the condition officially recognised.

The decision by the MoD not to challenge the ruling that Mr Izett's osteoporosis was caused by a cocktail of drugs before his planned deployment could have significant implications for hundreds of veterans who claim they are suffering from the syndrome.

The National Gulf War Veterans Association, which is calling for a public inquiry, said it was "an outstanding victory".

Because Mr Izett did not go to the Gulf the ruling adds weight to the veterans' argument that their ailments have been caused by the injections they were given and not by anything they may have encountered in the field.

Charles Plumridge, spokes- man for the National Gulf War Veterans Association, said: "We are now calling on the MoD to officially confirm that we are ill because of the inoculations we were given.

"The MoD has consistently said there is no scientific or medical evidence that we are ill - surely this judgment provides the medical evidence that we are ill as we claimed."

But the defence minister, Lewis Moonie, insisted there was still no proof that vaccinations were to blame for veterans' ill-health. He said the ruling was not being appealed because there were no legal grounds under which the MoD could challenge the ruling. "There is no medical evidence whatsoever to support that. The tribunal finding accepted that we could not prove that the ill-health was not due to the injections. That is a very, very different thing," he told the Today programme on Radio 4.

But Hilary Meredith, a solicitor who represents a number of Gulf war veterans claiming compensation, said it would be very difficult for the MoD to say that Gulf war syndrome does not exist when their own war pension says it does.

In Britain more than 3,000 veterans have reported symptoms of Gulf war syndrome with 1,100 receiving a war pension for illnesses linked to Gulf service. 571 British veterans have died, some from rare brain disorders and cancers.

The Liberal Democrat MP, Paul Tyler, a member of the Royal British Legion Gulf War Group, said: "The MoD has been in a state of deplorable denial. While US service personnel were properly treated, ours were accused of imagining their serious illnesses. We could not even be sure that those deployed in the recent Iraq war were avoiding the same problems - from a cocktail of injections - suffered in the first Gulf war in 1991."

Mr Izett, who lives in Bersenbruck in Germany, has suffered from osteoporosis for the last eight years and takes various a cocktail of anti-depressants and painkillers. "I'm in pain on a daily basis," he said. "But this finally proves that they made us ill."

He said the decision to give soldiers untested drugs in the first conflict was a mistake, and to do it in the run-up to the latest conflict was a "crime".

He added: "They still haven't learned. We already know of three cases where soldiers fighting in this war have come down ill because of the inoculations and it's disgusting for it to be happening again."


>>page top






[news mail 20 Apr 03]
"Al-Tuwaitha turned into a Horrific Uranium-contamination Zone"


Dear friends,

Midori again. I have received a following email today from my Japanese friend, Ms Y Maruta who is a member of the TUP/Translators United for Peace. Here is an important dispatch for you on a serious radio-active contamination at al-Tuwaitha, Iraq, as the villagers there have looted dozens of drums of yellow cake, uranium powder, and emptied out them in order to utilize drums for daily needs such as drinking water storage.

Midori

I received an appalling report from JAPAN. Mr. Hisataka Yamazaki, a member of the Depleted Uranium Study Group, reported the nuclear contamination at al-Tuwaitha, Iraq. He is particularly condemning the coalition forces for their lack of responsibility as an occupation army, who should now be in charge of the health and welfare of Iraq people.

As long as I know, this incident has been not widely reported in U.S and other coalition countries. If any, their reports tend to focus on the fear of nuclear proliferation.

(1) Break-in fear at nuclear store - UN seals broken at nuclear bomb plant:
We are worried over what happens if anyone has taken radioactive material (April 11 2003 The Guardian)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,934486,00.html

(2) Looters at key Iraqi nuke site terrify residents (May 8 2003, AFP)
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/05/07/1052280324928.html

(3) Nuclear watchdog fears terrorist dirty bomb after looting at al-Tuwaitha (May 14, 2003)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,955374,00.html

His report is based on the Asahi News Flash of May 7, the Kyodo News Flash of May 11, and Fuji TV Midnight News (They are all reliable Japanese big media). The following is a translation from his original report. (Translated by Y Maruta)

-------------------------------------------------------
"Al-Tuwaitha, Iraq: the Iraq Nuclear Complex Turned into a Horrific Uranium-contamination Zone"
Hisataka Yamazaki (Depleted Uranium Center/Japan) Saturday May 11, 2003

This is a horrific news - the scene of yellow-cake (i.e.refined uranium ore) contamination at al-Tuwaitha, Iraq. The news was on air as a part of the Fuji TV Midnight News program. I saw US troops with a Geiger counter guiding reporters in the al-Tuwaitha Nuclear Complex while a running telop reads "the counter records 700 times as high as the background radiation value"

What happened there?

At the al-Tuwaitha Nuclear Complex, the largest nuclear facility in Iraq, dozens of drums containing natural uranium called "yellow cake" were looted and their contents were discarded all over the site. Nuclear contamination due to the discarded uranium has been expanding into neighboring residential area and beyond. The looters did not want to steal uranium, but the drums! For them, uranium was just useless material.

Yellow cake is refined uranium ore, which contains not only natural uranium but also thorium, radium, radon and other radioactive elements that occur in the uranium decay process. Among them, radon is gaseous, so that its high-concentration gas may have filled the warehouse in which yellow cake had been stored for a long time. The looters invaded this building. They must have been exposed to and severely affected by this radioactive contamination.

It is very dangerous to approach such a contaminated site. To my dismay, the guiding US troops and our reporters from Fuji TV were all without protection; no mask,@no protection gear. They approached the entrance of the warehouse. Around its slightly opened door, I saw a heap of yellow cake discarded. It looked like that the US army stationed there had not done anything about it.

The scene changed to an interview with a family in a neighboring town, who claimed that they had stored water in one of those looted yellow-cake drums. The drum was no longer there, but their small children started to get rashes all over their bodies; the symptom of uranium's metallic toxin. This symptom was also claimed by their grown-ups . Clearly, the situation is very serious.

At the al-Tuwaitha complex, there are many eroded drums with holes, discarded in the open. Because they look like they have not been under supervision for a long time, they may contain nuclear waste. If no protective measures are taken, the waste will contaminate soil as well as deep underground water.

According to this TV report and the Asahi/Kyodo news flashes, such contamination did not occur when the Iraq army was in charge. It looks like the looting occurred after the Iraq army ran away with the US army approaching. But, this explanation is not plausible. It is reported that there were about 1,000 nuclear engineers at that time and a small amount of looting could not cause such devastation. It is probable that when the US army invaded the complex, they broke the security system and after that they took no measures. So, there was no way to prevent armed residents from looting the complex. This is one of the war crimes committed by the US forces in Iraq.

There is another point of view for this incident. The al-Tuwaitha complex was the center of the Iraq nuclear program and has kept various facilities necessary to operate the nuclear reactor destroyed in the 1981 bombing by Israel. So, if Iraq had wanted to make atomic bombs, the complex would have been the center of the operations. Why did the US army take no measure to prevent looting at the place in which the wanted WMDs were most likely hidden? We can draw the conclusion that the search for WMDs was just a convenient excuse to fend off the international opposition to the Iraq invasion.

Although yellow cake is useless without enrichment, it should be strictly supervised as material for nuclear weapons. But, the US forces took no measure, leaving it to be looted. This cannot be excused. They are heavily responsible for this possible nuclear proliferation, along with the radioactive exposure mentioned above.

Finally, I want to make an important point about this incident. Yellow cake and depleted uranium (DU) are both dangerous radioactive materials. It is possible that the official US claim that DU is not dangerous has led to this irresponsible treatment of yellow cake in al-Tuwaitha. That is, because the US forces have denied the danger of DU and used it all over Iraq, they cannot or don't want to emphasize to their troops the danger of yellow cake. They cannot or don't want to take any measures related to this incident.

Consequently, the same symptoms that Mr. Douglas Rokke@described about DU related disorders will spread among@residents in al-Tuwaitha. Already, many cases of skin@rash have been reported. It is predictable that respiratory-organ and whole-body symptoms, like@multiple-organ disorders, peripheral-nerve paralysis,@asthma, and dyspnea, will increase and frequent@occurrences of cancers will be reported in the long run.

Immediate measures to be taken include collecting anything@contaminated, such as yellow cake scattered over the@complex and drums brought out of the site, removing@contaminated soil, relocating and conducting health checks@on the residents of the contaminated areas, and giving@medical treatments to those with any symptoms. The@occupation army is definitely responsible for these@measures. Financial aid is also necessary because people@in the al-Tuwaitha area have no means of making a living@outside of there.

Even if those reports give only a bit of information, we@are at least informed that not only DU contamination but@also this type of nuclear contamination is spreading in@Iraq. However, the residents of the contaminated areas@are left uninformed. This is also not excusable.

(For more information, please contact Mt. Yamazaki at SDI00872@nifty.com)


---------------------------------------------
Iraq looters exposed to radioactive yellow cake
By TSUYOSHI NOJIMA, The Asahi Shimbun

They wanted water containers; they may have killed the village.

Iraq-Villagers looted a nuclear power facility here during the waning days of the war and instead of treasure, may have made off with death-drums filled with radioactive uranium oxide concentrate, also called yellow cake.

According to officials with the Iraq nuclear energy commission, the storage facility at Zafaraniya was guarded by Iraqi troops until April 4. However, they fled in the face of approaching U.S. Marines.

With the arrival of the Marines, the Zafaraniya facility was nominally under control of U.S. forces. However no special guards were posted and residents of a neighboring village looted the facility on April 6 and 7.

Most of the villagers have only an elementary school education. While they knew the facility was related to nuclear energy, they did not know that radioactive materials were stored there. By April 8, when Iraq nuclear energy commission officials got a handle on the situation, they discovered about 100 drums containing yellow cake were missing.

It appears the villagers did not know what the yellow cake was nor had any interest in it. With only about 60 households, the village did not have piped-in water and the looters wanted to use the drums for water storage.

In what may prove to be deadly errors, they dumped the radioactive substance on land near their village and washed the drums in a local river.

Officials believe the looters inevitably inhaled large quantities of the uranium. To make a bad situation worse, the villagers may have ingested radioactive material after converting the drums to water and cooking oil containers.

Yellow cake is produced when refining uranium ore. Through further processing, it can be used as fuel rods for nuclear reactors or in nuclear weapons. An official with the Iraq nuclear energy commission said Iraq refined the uranium from imports from Nigeria and Portugal in 1978 for its nuclear development program. About 300 drums of refined uranium had been in storage at Zafaraniya for about 20 years.

The site was visited last January and February by inspectors from the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission and the International Atomic Energy Agency. The inspectors found no safety problems at the facility.

The Zafaraniya facility is located about 30 kilometers southeast of Baghdad and includes an experimental nuclear reactor and research labs.

To read more:
http://www.asahi.com/english/international/K2003050800179.html


>>page top





[news mail 18 Apr 03]
Free to commit crimes and do bad things


Dear friends,

How are you?

Midori at the Children of the Gulf War photo exhibition UK tour writing. I'm still in Japan. It was sunny and hot day today. Following news mail are about the looters in Iraq. I have imagined you already hear and read lots of news about that. But you can find some different points of view about the looters from the below. If you don't want such a news email from me, please let me know. I will remove your email address from my mailing list.

-------------------------------
1. Free to do bad things
By Brian Whitaker April 12 2003 The Guardian

2. Library books, letters and priceless documents are set ablaze in final chapter of the sacking of Baghdad
By Robert Fisk 15 April 2003 The Independent

3. US Troops Encouraged Ransacking
By Ole Rothenborg 11 April 2003 Dagens Nyheter (Sweden's newspaper)

4. Americans defend two untouchable ministries from the hordes of looters
By Robert Fisk in Baghdad 14 April 2003 The Independent

5. Iraq Diaries - Other Hearts
By Kathy Kelly, Iraq Peace Team 15 April 2003

-------------------------------
1. Free to do bad things
By Brian Whitaker April 12 2003 The Guardian

On one of the bleakest days since the invasion began, US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld yesterday shrugged off turmoil and looting in Iraq as signs of the people's freedom.

"It's untidy, and freedom's untidy," he said, jabbing his hand in the air. "Free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things. They're also free to live their lives and do wonderful things."

"The images you are seeing on television you are seeing over, and over, and over, and it's the same picture of some person walking out of some building with a vase, and you see it 20 times, and you think, 'My goodness, were there that many vases? Is it possible that there were that many vases in the whole country?' "

To read more:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/dailybriefing/story/0,12965,935381,00.html

-------------------------------
2. Library books, letters and priceless documents are set ablaze in final chapter of the sacking of Baghdad
By Robert Fisk 15 April 2003 The Independent

So yesterday was the burning of books. First came the looters, then the arsonists. It was the final chapter in the sacking of Baghdad. The National Library and Archives - a priceless treasure of Ottoman historical documents, including the old royal archives of Iraq - were turned to ashes in 3,000 degrees of heat. Then the library of Korans at the Ministry of Religious Endowment was set ablaze.

I saw the looters. One of them cursed me when I tried to reclaim a book of Islamic law from a boy of no more than 10. Amid the ashes of Iraqi history, I found a file blowing in the wind outside: pages of handwritten letters between the court of Sharif Hussein of Mecca, who started the Arab revolt against the Turks for Lawrence of Arabia, and the Ottoman rulers of Baghdad.

And the Americans did nothing. All over the filthy yard they blew, letters of recommendation to the courts of Arabia, demands for ammunition for troops, reports on the theft of camels and attacks on pilgrims, all in delicate hand-written Arabic script. I was holding in my hands the last Baghdad vestiges of Iraq's written history. But for Iraq, this is Year Zero; with the destruction of the antiquities in the Museum of Archaeology on Saturday and the burning of the National Archives and then the Koranic library, the cultural identity of Iraq is being erased. Why? Who set these fires? For what insane purpose is this heritage being destroyed?

When I caught sight of the Koranic library burning - flames 100 feet high were bursting from the windows - I raced to the offices of the occupying power, the US Marines' Civil Affairs Bureau. An officer shouted to a colleague that "this guy says some biblical [sic] library is on fire". I gave the map location, the precise name - in Arabic and English. I said the smoke could be seen from three miles away and it would take only five minutes to drive there. Half an hour later, there wasn't an American at the scene - and the flames were shooting 200 feet into the air.

To read more:
http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=397350

-------------------------------
3. US Troops Encouraged Ransacking
By Ole Rothenborg 11 April 2003 Dagens Nyheter (Sweden's newspaper)

[This is a translation of an article from April 11 from Dagens Nyheter, Sweden's largest newspaper, based in Stockholm. The article was written by Ole Rothenborg and translated by Joe Valasek.]

Khaled Bayomi, has taught and researched on Middle Eastern conflicts for ten years at the University of Lund where he is also working on his doctorate. He has given his permission for this interview to be widely disseminated. Khaled Bayomi looks surprised when the American officer on TV complains that they don't have the resources to stop the plundering in Baghdad. "I happened to be right there just as the American troops encouraged people to begin the plundering."

Khaled Bayomi traveled from Europe to Baghdad to be a human shield and arrived on the same day that the war began. About this he can tell many stories but the most interesting is certainly his eyewitness account of the wave of plundering.

"I had gone to see some friends who live near a dilapidated area just past Haifa Avenue on the west bank of the Tigris. It was the 8th of April and the fighting was so intense that I was unable to return to the other side of the river. In the afternoon it became perfectly quiet and four American tanks took places on the edge of the slum area. The soldiers shot two Sudanese guards who stood at their posts outside a local administration building on the other side of Haifa Avenue. Then they blasted apart the doors to the building and from the tanks came eager calls in Arabic encouraging people to come close to them. "

"The entire morning, everyone who had tried to cross the road had been shot. But in the strange silence after all the shooting, people gradually became curious. After 45 minutes, the first Baghdad citizens dared to come out. Arab interpreters in the tanks told the people to go and take what they wanted in the building."

"The word spread quickly and the building was ransacked. I was standing only 300 yards from there when the guards were murdered. Afterwards the tank crushed the entrance to the Justice Department, which was in a neighboring building, and the plundering continued there".

"I stood in a large crowd and watched this together with them. They did not partake in the plundering but dared not to interfere. Many had tears of shame in their eyes. The next morning the plundering spread to the Modern Museum, which lies a quarter mile farther north. There were also two crowds there, one that plundered and one with watched with disgust."

"Are you saying that it was US troops who initiated the plundering?"

"Absolutely. The lack of jubilant scenes meant that the American troops needed pictures of Iraqis who in different ways demonstrated hatred for Saddam's regime."

To read more:
http://truthout.org/docs_03/041603D.shtml

Dagens Nyheter site:
http://www.dn.se/

-------------------------------
4. Americans defend two untouchable ministries from the hordes of looters
By Robert Fisk 14 April 2003 The Independent

Iraq's scavengers have thieved and destroyed what they have been allowed to loot and burn by the Americans - and a two-hour drive around Baghdad shows clearly what the US intends to protect. After days of arson and pillage, here's a short but revealing scorecard. US troops have sat back and allowed mobs to wreck and then burn the Ministry of Planning, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Irrigation, the Ministry of Trade, the Ministry of Industry, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Information. They did nothing to prevent looters from destroying priceless treasures of Iraq's history in the Baghdad Archaeological Museum and in the museum in the northern city of Mosul, or from looting three hospitals.

The Americans have, though, put hundreds of troops inside two Iraqi ministries that remain untouched - and untouchable - because tanks and armoured personnel carriers and Humvees have been placed inside and outside both institutions. And which ministries proved to be so important for the Americans? Why, the Ministry of Interior, of course - with its vast wealth of intelligence information on Iraq - and the Ministry of Oil. The archives and files of Iraq's most valuable asset - its oilfields and, even more important, its massive reserves - are safe and sound, sealed off from the mobs and looters, and safe to be shared, as Washington almost certainly intends, with American oil companies.

To read more:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=396997

-------------------------------
5. Iraq Diaries - Other Hearts
By Kathy Kelly, Iraq Peace Team 15 April 2003

I met Hisham at the Baghdad School of Folk Music and Ballet, in January 2002. Hisham and Majid, both graduates of the school, taught there in the daytime and then rehearsed with the orchestra at night. Knowing how busy Hisham was, I felt presumptuous about suggesting a project for him and his students. I told him how meaningful the song "O Finlandia" has been to many people in the US. At least 150 families who lost loved ones on 9/11 had used this peace anthem as part of memorial services. Sibelius composed the melody in the late 19th century. Following World War I, lyrics were created emphasizing the common aspirations and dreams shared by all humanity.

Hisham chuckled and couldn't resist pointing out the irony that someone from the US wanted to teach his students a peace song. "O.K.," said he, "Sing it for me. We can do this." Within two days, an entire class was singing an Arabic transliteration of the song.

Saying goodbye to Majid and Hisham, that morning, I felt a wave of sadness, wondering if the hopeful, idealistic verses might embitter them now.

The next morning they returned, shaken and distraught. They had approached US soldiers the previous evening asking for help to protect their school. The soldiers said it was not their job and ordered Hisham and Majid to go away. They went to the entrance of the school hoping they could somehow protect it alone. Five armed men arrived. Majid, Hisham and Hisham's brother pled with them not to attack the school. The looters argued, "We are simple people. Poor people. Soon there will be no food, no money, and we have no jobs. You are rich people."

"Please," Majid said, "we will give you the instruments, give you the furniture, but don't destroy the music, the records, the history." "No," the armed men said. "Baghdad is finished." They ransacked the school, broke many instruments, burnt the music and the records.

"Here," Hisham said, "listen to this. This is all we have left." He handed me headphones borrowed from a Norwegian television correspondent. The orchestra was playing "O Finlandia." Listening to the children craft their music, I softly sang the words: "This is my song, O God of all the nations. A song of peace for lands afar and mine. This is my home, the country where my heart is. Here are my dreams, my hopes, my holy shrine. But other hearts in other lands are beating, with hopes and dreams as deep and true as mine." Then I stopped. Hisham had begun to cry.

To read more:
http://electronicIraq.net/news/653.shtml


>>page top




[news mail 15 Apr 03]
Image-making, lies and the "liberation" of Iraq


Dear friends,

Midori at the Children of the Gulf War UK tour writing. How are you? I am sending this news mail using my temporally mail address instead of my usually one, because I am in Japan now. I can't send an email from my account but I can receive it at midori@dircon.co.uk.


----------------------------------------
The stage-managed events in Baghdadfs Firdos Square:
image-making, lies and the "liberation" of Iraq
By Patrick Martin
12 April 2003 World Socialist Web Site www.wsws.org

Several photographs publicized by an antiwar web site shed light on the way the American media is manipulating images of the war in Iraq to give the false impression that the vast majority of the Iraqi people are joyfully welcoming the invasion and occupation of their country by US and British troops.

These photographs, available on the web site of Information Clearing House http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2842.htm show that the toppling of a statue of Saddam Hussein in Firdos Square, given massive publicity in the US and international media April 9-10, was a stage-managed affair. As transmitted to the world by US television and newspaper reports, the pictures from Firdos Square purported to show a mass of enthusiastic Iraqis hailing the US military and trampling on a gargantuan bronze statue of Saddam Hussein. Hours of television time and pages of newspaper coverage were devoted to these pictures, with accompanying commentary comparing the scene to the bringing down of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the liberation of Paris in 1944.

The first photograph on the Information Clearing House site is a wide-angle shot encompassing the entire expanse of Firdos Square, rather than the narrowly focused, closely cropped framing used in the mass media. It shows that the gcrowdh surrounding the statue of Saddam Hussein is anything but massive, and that the square itself has been surrounded by US Abrams tanks, cutting it off from the rest of the city.

Clearing House site
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2842.htm

The caption supplied by the site notes that Firdos Square is across the street from the Palestine Hotel, where most international journalists based in Baghdad are located, a fact that even the Washington Postfs TV critic noted was geither splendid luck or brilliant planning on the part of the military.h Of the 200 or so assembled, the majority were journalists and American soldiers. The BBC reported that only gdozensh of Iraqis were involved.

Who those dozens were is suggested by two additional photographs published below the wide-angle photo. They show the arrival from exile of the Pentagonfs handpicked Iraqi gleader,h Ahmed Chalabi, in Nasiriya on April 6, accompanied by several aides, and a close-up of one of the participants in the April 9 statue demolition scene in Baghdad. It is clear from the two pictures that the man celebrating gliberationh in Baghdad was one of those accompanying Chalabi into Nasiriya three days earlier.

The significance of this should be clear: those who gspontaneouslyh gathered in Firdos Square included Iraqi political agents of the American military, dispatched from Nasiriya to Baghdad to serve as an appropriate backdrop for the visuals desired by Bush administration spin doctors. If not gWag the Dog,h it is at least a case of grent a crowd.h Or, as Robert Fisk of the British newspaper the Independent described it, gthe most staged photo-opportunity since Iwo Jima.h

To a critical observer, the live coverage from Firdos Square had already suggested that there was less than met the eye to the scenes of universal rejoicing. Even this small and controlled crowd fell silent and muttered its disapproval when a US Marine initially draped the statuefs head with an American flag. An Iraqi onlooker supplied one of his own countryfs flags, and there were cheers when this replaced the Stars and Stripes.
<